Lamken v. Stierman et al
| Matthew Francis Lamken |
| Robyn Falquez, Arizona, State of and Mary Stierman |
| 4:2019cv00318 |
| June 17, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| D Thomas Ferraro |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 2, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 CLERK'S JUDGMENT - IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that pursuant to the Court's order filed June 27, 2019, the complaint and action are dismissed without prejudice for failure to comply with the Court's order. (MCO) |
| Filing 8 Agreement to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Party agrees to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAC) |
| Filing 7 REQUEST BY NON-PRISONER PRO SE PARTY FOR ELECTRONIC NOTICING filed by Matthew Francis Lamken. Pro se parties must promptly notify the Clerks Office, in writing, if there is a change in designated e-mail address or mailing address. (MCO) |
Filing 6
ORDERED that the complaint (Doc. #1 ) is dismissed. Plaintiff may file an amended complaint within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. The Clerk of the Court shall terminate this action without further notice if Plaintiff fails to comply with this deadline. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. #2 ) is denied. Signed by Senior Judge Raner C Collins on 6/26/2019. (MCO)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANT re informational documents attached: (1) Notice to Self-Represented Litigant, (2) Federal Court Self-Service Clinic Flyer, (3) Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2, and (4) Notice and Request re Electronic Noticing. (KAH) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (KAH) |
| Filing 3 This case has been assigned to the Honorable D Thomas Ferraro. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-19-00318-TUC-DTF. Magistrate Election form attached. (KAH) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Matthew Francis Lamken. (KAH) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Matthew Francis Lamken. (KAH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
