Silliman v. Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency et al
| April Silliman |
| Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency, C Doran Vance, Jr., Fedloan Servicing and Unknown Party |
| 4:2019cv00337 |
| July 1, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Jennifer G Zipps |
| Other Statutes: Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 29, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency, C Doran Vance, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(Meece, Teresa) |
Filing 10
ORDER the proposed Stipulation to Extend Time (Doc. #9 ) is GRANTED. Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency answer due 8/29/2019. Signed by Judge Jennifer G Zipps on 7/24/2019. (DLC)
|
| Filing 9 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT re: #1 Complaint by Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Meece, Teresa) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Teresa Pauline Meece on behalf of Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency. (Meece, Teresa) |
| Filing 7 SERVICE EXECUTED : Proof of Service re: Summons upon C. Doran Vance, Jr. on 7/8/2019. (MFR) |
| Filing 6 SERVICE EXECUTED : Proof of Service re: Summons upon Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency on 7/8/2019. (MFR) |
|
Filing 5
NOTICE TO THE PARTIES that motions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) are discouraged if the defect can be cured by filing an amended pleading. (See attached Order for complete details). Signed by Judge Jennifer G Zipps on 7/1/2019. (DLC)
|
| Summons Issued in person at Customer Service Intake Counter as to Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency, C Doran Vance, Jr. (LML) This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (DLC) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE TO SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANT re informational documents attached: (1) Notice to Self-Represented Litigant, (2) Federal Court Self-Service Clinic Flyer, (3) Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2, and (4) Notice and Request re Electronic Noticing. (DLC) |
| Filing 2 Filing fee paid, receipt number TUC030609. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Jennifer G Zipps. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-19-337-TUC-JGZ. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (DLC) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number TUC030609 filed by April Silliman. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A-E, #3 Receipt)(DLC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
