McLane et al v. Pima, County of et al
| John Thomas Cooper, Jr. and Jonathan McLane |
| Lucas McCain, Mark Holden, Scott Porter, Rick Bruster, Pima, County of and Chris Poirier |
| 4:2019cv00366 |
| July 19, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Jacqueline M Rateau |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 Agreement to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Party agrees to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (KEP) |
| Filing 13 Magistrate Election Form Deadline resent on this date. (BAC) |
| Filing 12 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Rick Bruster, Mark Holden, Pima, County of, Chris Poirier, Scott Porter: Rule 4 Waiver of Service of Summons. Waiver sent on August 5, 2019 to Pima County, Scott Porter, Chris Poirier, Mark Holden and Rick Bruster . (Lukach, Lesley) |
| Filing 11 Magistrate Election Form Deadline resent on 8/6/19. (BAC) |
Filing 10
ORDER granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis; granting #4 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Plaintiffs may proceed without prepayment of costs or fees or the necessity of giving security therefor. Plaintiffs shall be responsible for service by waiver or of the summons and complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline M Rateau on 8/2/2019. (DLC)
|
| Filing 9 MOTION to Allow Electronic Filing by a Party Appearing Without an Attorney by John Thomas Cooper, Jr. (DLC) |
| Filing 8 REQUEST BY NON-PRISONER PRO SE PARTY FOR ELECTRONIC NOTICING filed by John Thomas Cooper, Jr. Pro se parties must promptly notify the Clerks Office, in writing, if there is a change in designated e-mail address or mailing address. (DLC) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (DLC) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANT re informational documents attached: (1) Notice to Self-Represented Litigant, (2) Federal Court Self-Service Clinic Flyer, (3) Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2, and (4) Notice and Request re Electronic Noticing. (DLC) |
| Filing 5 This case has been assigned to the Honorable Jacqueline M Rateau. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-19-366-TUC-JR. Magistrate Election form attached. (DLC) |
| Filing 4 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by John Thomas Cooper, Jr. (DLC) |
| Filing 3 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Jonathan McLane. (DLC) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Order to Show Cause Re: Request for Preliminary Injunction by John Thomas Cooper, Jr and Jonathan McLane. (DLC) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by John Thomas Cooper, Jr. and Jonathan McLane.(DLC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
