Minta v. New York Life Insurance Company et al
Michelle Minta |
New York Life Insurance Company, Paul Revere Life Insurance Company and Unum Group |
4:2019cv00376 |
July 24, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Frank R Zapata |
Contract: Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 ORDER the Defendant shall have until and including September 24, 2019 to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint. Signed by Senior Judge Frank R Zapata on 9/11/2019. (DLC) |
Filing 11 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer (First Request) by New York Life Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Reich, Adam) |
Filing 10 AMENDED COMPLAINT against New York Life Insurance Company filed by Michelle Minta.(Richards, Clayton) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Filing Amended Pleading pursuant to LRCiv 15.1(b) by Michelle Minta . (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Richards, Clayton) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Party Dismissal by Michelle Minta. Party Paul Revere Life Insurance Company (a Massachusetts Corporation ) and Unum Group (a Delaware Corporation) terminated. (Richards, Clayton) |
Filing 7 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Michelle Minta: Affidavit of Service re: Summons (Doc. 5-1); Complaint (Doc. 1); Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge (Doc. 3); Notice re: MIDP (Doc. 4); Civil Coversheet (Doc. 1-1) upon The Paul Revere Life Insurance Company on August 1, 2019. (Ronstadt, Erin) |
Filing 6 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Michelle Minta: Affidavit of Service re: Summons (Doc. 5); Complaint (Doc. 1); Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge (Doc. 3); Notice re: MIDP (Doc. 4); Civil Coversheet (Doc. 1-1) upon New York Life Insurance Company on August 1, 2019. (Ronstadt, Erin) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to New York Life Insurance Company, Paul Revere Life Insurance Company, Unum Group. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(MFR). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (MFR) |
Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-17197520. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Frank R Zapata. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-19-0376-TUC-FRZ. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (MFR) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Michelle Minta. (Ronstadt, Erin) (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(MFR) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-17197520 filed by Michelle Minta. (Ronstadt, Erin) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(MFR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.