Appolon #324876 v. Enderle et al
| Esterlin Appolon |
| Kevin Unknown, James E Marner, Ashley C Enderle, Julie Sottosanti, Joel Feinman, Grant D Wille and Unknown Party |
| 4:2019cv00381 |
| July 29, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Pro Se (Tucson) |
| Cindy K Jorgenson |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #4 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. The Complaint is dismissed for failure to comply with Local Rule of Civil Procedure 3.4. Plaintiff has 30 days from the date this Order is filed to file a first amended complaint in compliance with this Order. If Plaintiff fails to comply, the Clerk of Court must enter a judgment of dismissal of this action without prejudice. Signed by Senior Judge Cindy K Jorgenson on 9/17/2019. (BAR)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION to Appoint a Marshal or Someone Specially Appointed to Serve Summons and Complaint by Esterlin Appolon. (1 page) (BAR) |
| Filing 5 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Esterlin Appolon. (BAR) |
| Filing 4 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Esterlin Appolon. (2 pages) (BAR) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE: FRCiv. 5.2 Privacy Protection Guidelines.(BAC) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (BAC) |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed by Esterlin Appolon. (10 pages). (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(BAC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
