Pace v. Burch
Petitioner: Allen Pace, III
Respondent: Christian Burch
Case Number: 4:2019cv00404
Filed: August 14, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: D Thomas Ferraro (PS)
Referring Judge: James A Soto
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 4, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER: Petitioner has 30 days from the date of filing of this Order to file an amended 2241 petition in compliance with the August 21, 2019 Order and this Order. If Petitioner fails to file a second amended petition within 30 days, the Clerk of Court must enter a judgment of dismissal of this action, without prejudice and without further notice to Petitioner and deny any pending unrelated motions as moot. Signed by Judge James A Soto on 10/4/2019. (ARC)
September 13, 2019 Filing 8 Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number TUC030990. (BAR)
August 30, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDERED that Petitioner's #5 Emergency Motion to Expedite 2241 Motion is denied as moot. Signed by Judge James A Soto on 8/30/2019. (BAR)
August 22, 2019 Filing 6 Party agrees to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction in Habeas Case. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (KEP)
August 21, 2019 Filing 5 Emergency MOTION to Expedite 2241 Motion by Allen Pace, III. (1 page)(KEP)
August 21, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDERED within 30 days of the date this Order is filed, Petitioner must either pay the $5.00 filing fee or file a complete Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. If Petitioner fails to either pay or file a complete Application within 30 days, the Clerk of Court must enter a judgment of dismissal of this action without prejudice and without further notice to Petitioner. Petitioner's "Emergency Motion Pro Se, Under 28 U.S.C Section 2241" (Doc. #1 ) and "Pro Se, Amended Motion, Under 28 U.S.C. Section 2241" (Doc. #3 ) are dismissed with leave to amend. Petitioner has 30 days from the date of filing of this Order to file a second amended. If Petitioner fails to file a second amended within 30 days the Clerk of Court must enter a judgment of dismissal of this action, without prejudice and without further notice to Petitioner and deny any pending unrelated motions as moot. Signed by Judge James A Soto on 8/21/2019. (See attached Order for details) (KEP)
August 19, 2019 Filing 3 AMENDED PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Fed/2241) filed by Allen Pace, III. (10 pages) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(KEP)
August 14, 2019 Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (DLC)
August 14, 2019 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Fed/2241) filed by Allen Pace, III. (19 pages) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope)(DLC)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pace v. Burch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Allen Pace, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Christian Burch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?