Nunez v. United States of America et al
| Edward Nunez |
| United States of America and Attorney General of the State of Arizona |
| 4:2019cv00409 |
| August 15, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Maria S Davila (PS) |
| Rosemary Marquez |
| Prisoner: Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 28, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 CLERK'S JUDGMENT - IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that pursuant to the Court's Order filed August 28, 2019, judgment of dismissal is entered. Petitioner to take nothing and this action is hereby dismissed. (ARC) |
Filing 3
ORDERED: Petitioner's "Probation Violation Petition for 180 Day Writ of Habeas" (Doc. #1 ) and this case are dismissed. The Clerk of Court must enter judgment accordingly and close this case. The Clerk of Court must modify the docket to reflect that the "Probation Violation Petition for 180 Day Writ of Habeas" (Doc. #1 ) is a "Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Fed/2241)" and the Cause Number is "28:2241." The Clerk of Court must also remove the Arizona Attorney General as a Respondent. Signed by Judge Rosemary Marquez on 8/28/2019. (ARC)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (BAC) |
| Filing 1 *PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Fed/2241) filed by Edward Nunez. (4 pages). (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(BAC) *Modified on 8/28/2019 to correct case type, per order #3 (ARC). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
