Woytenko et al v. Ochoa et al
| Emma Woytenko and Alexander W Woytenko |
| Desert Southwest Industries Incorporated, Jose Ricardo Lopez Ochoa, Richard Bennett Soto, Buster Wholesale Auto LLC, Sergio Montero Arballo, Ronald M Johnson, Guadalupe Hernandez Soto and Desert Southwest Industries Incorporated doing business as Jeffs Auto Parts |
| 4:2019cv00413 |
| August 20, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| David C Bury |
| Other Statutes: Other Statutory Actions |
| 49 U.S.C. ยง 32710 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Desert Southwest Industries Incorporated.(Gee, Lawrence) |
Filing 9
ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that the #7 Application for Entry of Default is GRANTED Against Defendant Desert Southwest Industries, Inc dba Jeff's Auto Parts. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall enter default against Defendant Desert Southwest Industries Inc, d.b.a. Jeffs Auto Parts. Signed by Senior Judge David C Bury on 9/24/19.(BAC)
|
| Filing 8 Clerk's ENTRY OF DEFAULT as to Desert Southwest Industries Incorporated. (BAC) |
| Filing 7 APPLICATION for Entry of Default by Plaintiff Alexander W Woytenko against Desert Southwest Industries Inc. d.b.a. Jeffs Auto Parts. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit In Support of Application for Default, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Bybee, Floyd) |
| Filing 6 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Alexander W Woytenko: Proof of Service re: Summons, Complaint, and Order Regarding MIDP upon Desert Southwest Industries Inc. d.b.a. Jeffs Auto Parts on 08/22/2019. (Bybee, Floyd) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons, #6 Summons)(KEP). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (KEP) |
| Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-17303065. This case has been assigned to the Honorable David C. Bury. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-19-413-TUC-DCB. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (KEP) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Alexander W Woytenko, Emma Woytenko. (Bybee, Floyd) (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons, #6 Summons)(KEP) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-17303065 filed by Emma Woytenko, Alexander W Woytenko. (Bybee, Floyd) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit)(KEP) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
