Allen v. Neuromonitoring Associates LLC
Plaintiff: LeMae Allen
Defendant: Neuromonitoring Associates LLC
Case Number: 4:2019cv00488
Filed: October 7, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: Rosemary Marquez
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 25, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER: Pursuant to Plaintiff's Notice of Dismissal dismissing this action without prejudice, IT IS ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall close this case. Signed by Judge Rosemary Marquez on 10/24/2019. (ARC)
October 9, 2019 Filing 6 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by LeMae Allen. (Urman, Gary)
October 7, 2019 Filing 5 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #1 Notice of Removal filed by Neuromonitoring Associates LLC. Document not in compliance with LRCiv 7.1(a)(3) - Party names must be capitalized using proper upper and lower case type. No further action is required. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAC)
October 7, 2019 Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (BAC)
October 7, 2019 Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-17490170. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Rosemary Marquez. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-19-00488-TUC-RM. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached.(BAC)
October 7, 2019 Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Neuromonitoring Associates LLC. (Clukey, David) (BAC)
October 7, 2019 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Graham County Superior Court, case number SO500CV2019-00081. Filing fee received: $400.00, receipt number 0970-17490170 filed by Neuromonitoring Associates LLC. (Clukey, David) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplemental Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit 1, #4 Exhibit 2)(BAC)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Allen v. Neuromonitoring Associates LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: LeMae Allen
Represented By: Gary Frank Urman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Neuromonitoring Associates LLC
Represented By: Julie E Maurer
Represented By: David Christian Clukey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?