Minley v. Shinn et al
| Judy Minley |
| David Shinn and Mark Brnovich |
| 4:2019cv00490 |
| October 8, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Bruce G Macdonald (PS) |
| Jennifer G Zipps |
| Prisoner: Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
Party agrees to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction in Habeas Case. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MCO)
|
|
Filing 4
Additional Attachments to Main Document re: 3 Notice of Deficiency (Text Only) Civil Cover Sheet by Petitioner Judy Minley. (Storts, Brick)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State/2254) filed by Judy Minley. Pursuant to the Electronic Case Filing Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual Section II(B), attorneys are required to submit the automated Civil Cover Sheet when filing a new case. FOLLOW-UP ACTION REQUIRED: Please refile with correct PDF document. Deficiency must be corrected within one business day of this notice. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (KEP)
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (KEP)
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State/2254). Filing fee received: $ 5.00, receipt number 0970-17494333 filed by Judy Minley. (Storts, Brick) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(KEP)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
