Radcliff v. Napier et al
| Christopher Lee Radcliff |
| Unknown Party, Mark D Napier and Lindy Dyer |
| 4:2019cv00533 |
| November 6, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Pro Se (Tucson) |
| David C Bury |
| Prisoner: Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER Within 30 days of the date this Order is filed, Plaintiff must either pay the $350.00 filing fee and $50.00 administrative fee or file a complete Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and a certified six-month trust account statement. If Plaintiff fails to either pay or file a complete Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis within 30 days, the Clerk of Court must enter a judgment of dismissal of this action without prejudice and without further notice to Plaintiff and deny any pending unrelated motions as moot. The Clerk of Court must mail Plaintiff a court-approved form for filing anApplication to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Non-Habeas). Signed by Senior Judge David C Bury on 12/16/2019. (DLC)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (MCO) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Christopher Lee Radcliff. (3 pages, including order) (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(MCO) |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed by Christopher Lee Radcliff. (7 pages) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(MCO) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
