Russell v. University of Arizona et al
Richard Alan Russell |
Kevin F Moynahan, Sean P Elliott, Unknown Parties, Taylor Riall, Arizona Board of Regents, University of Arizona College of Medicine and Richard Kumet |
4:2020cv00028 |
January 16, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Jacqueline M Rateau |
Other Statutes: Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
18 U.S.C. ยง 1961 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 25, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 ORDER denying #9 Motioning You to Read. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline M Rateau on 2/27/2020. (MCO) |
Filing 9 MOTION for You to Read by Richard Alan Russell. (MCO) |
Filing 8 ORDER that Plaintiff's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. #2 ) is granted. It is further Ordered that Plaintiff's Complaint (Doc. #1 ) is dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff may file a First Amended Complaint on or before 3/20/2020. If he fails to do so, the Court shall close the case. It is further Ordered that Plaintiffs Motion to Seal Documents and to Accept Digital Records (Doc. #4 ) is denied and the lodged exhibits are ordered stricken. The original copies of Plaintiff's exhibits shall be available in the Clerk's office until 2/21/2020 (see attached Order for complete details). Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline M Rateau on 2/7/2020. (MFR) |
Filing 7 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (DLC) |
Filing 6 This case has been assigned to the Honorable Jacqueline M Rateau. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-20-28-TUC-JR. Magistrate Election form attached. (DLC) |
Filing 5 SEALED LODGED Proposed Documents re: #4 MOTION to Seal Document, MOTION to Accept Digital Records with Recording. Document to be filed by Clerk if Motion or Stipulation to Seal is granted. Filed by Richard Alan Russell. (Attachments: #1 Attachment 2, Part 1, #2 Attachment 2, Part 2, #3 Attachment 2, Part 3, #4 Attachment 2, Part 4, #5 Attachment 2, Part 5)(MFR) |
Filing 4 MOTION to Seal Document, MOTION to Accept Digital Records with Recording, etc. by Richard Alan Russell. (MFR) |
Filing 3 NOTICE TO SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANT re informational documents attached: (1) Notice to Self-Represented Litigant, (2) Federal Court Self-Service Clinic Flyer, (3) Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2, and (4) Notice and Request re Electronic Noticing. (DLC) |
Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Richard Alan Russell. (DLC) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Richard Alan Russell. (Attachments: #1 Attachment 1, #2 Attachment 2, #3 Attachment 3, #4 Attachment 4, #5 Attachment 5, #6 Attachment 6, #7 Attachment 7, #8 Attachment 8, #9 Attachment 9, #10 Attachment 10, #11 Attachment 11, #12 Attachment 12, #13 Attachment 13, #14 Attachment 14, #15 Attachment 15)(DLC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.