Biddings v. Frias et al
| Stonney Biddings |
| Unknown Baker, Unknown Segura and Eric Frias |
| 4:2020cv00037 |
| January 23, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Pro Se (Tucson) |
| Rosemary Marquez |
| Prisoner: Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER Plaintiff must either serve each Defendant or seek a waiver of service for each Defendant. If Plaintiff does not either obtain a waiver of service of the summons or complete service of the Summons and Complaint on a Defendant within 90 days of the filing of the Complaint, the action may be dismissed as to each Defendant not served. Defendants must answer the Complaint or otherwise respond by appropriate motion. The Court may strike any answer, response, or other motion or paper that does not identify the specific Defendant by name on whose behalf it is filed. This matter is assigned to the standard track pursuant to Rule 16.2(b)(3) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure and to the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot pursuant to General Order 17-08. Signed by Judge Rosemary Marquez on 2/28/2020. (DLC)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #1 Complaint filed by Stonney Biddings. Document not in compliance with LRCiv 7.1 (a)(1) - Attorney information is not listed in the top left corner of the first page. No further action is required. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (KEP) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #1 Complaint filed by Stonney Biddings. Document not in compliance with LRCiv 7.1(a)(3) - Party names must be capitalized using proper upper and lower case type. No further action is required. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (KEP) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (KEP) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (KEP) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Stonney Biddings. (Radner, Solomon) (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(KEP) |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-17869877 filed by Stonney Biddings. (Radner, Solomon) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Corporate Disclosure Statement)(KEP) |
| Remark: Pro hac vice motion(s) granted for Solomon Mordechai Radner on behalf of Plaintiff Stonney Biddings. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
