Van v. Shinn et al
| Walter James Van, Jr. |
| David Shinn and Mark Brnovich |
| 4:2020cv00047 |
| January 27, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| D Thomas Ferraro (PS) |
| D Thomas Ferraro |
| Rosemary Marquez |
| Prisoner: Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Mark Brnovich answer due 4/29/2020; David Shinn answer due 4/29/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge D Thomas Ferraro on 3/17/2020. (DLC)
|
| Filing 8 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State/2254) (First Request) by Mark Brnovich, David Shinn. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Order)(Moody, Karen) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Karen Elizabeth Moody on behalf of Mark Brnovich, David Shinn. (Moody, Karen) |
| Filing 6 Notice of Receipt of Electronic Service of Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Arizona Attorney General on 02/18/20. The Attorney General's Office will file a Notice of Appearance within five (5) business days that identifies the respondents that are represented or, in the alternative, will notify the Court if the Attorney General is not able to accept service for and/or represent any of the named respondents. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (Nielsen, Jim) |
|
Filing 5
Arizona Attorney General Service Order (2254): The Clerk of Court must serve a copy of the Petition (Doc. 1) and this Order on the Respondent(s) and the Attorney General of the State of Arizona by electronic mail pursuant to Rule 4, Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, and the Memorandum of Understanding between the United States District Clerk of Court for the District of Arizona and the Arizona Attorney General's Office. Within 2 business days, the Attorney General's Office will acknowledge receipt of the Petition and the Court's Order and within 5 business days will either file a notice of appearance on behalf of Respondents or will notify the Court of the names of the Respondents on whose behalf the Arizona Attorney General's Office will not accept service of process. This matter is referred to Magistrate Judge D. Thomas Ferraro pursuant to Rules 72.1 and 72.2 of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure for further proceedings and a report and recommendation. Signed by Judge Rosemary Marquez on 02/18/20. (SEE ATTACHED ORDER FOR COMPLETE DETAILS.) (Attachments: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus)(MYE)
|
| Filing 4 Party agrees to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction in Habeas Case. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (ARC) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (MYE) |
| Filing 2 MINUTE ORDER: Senior Judge Raner C Collins assigned in error. This case has been directly reassigned to Judge Rosemary Marquez due to related case CV-17-303-TUC-RM. All future filings shall reflect the following case number: CR-20-47-TUC-RM--DTF. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MYE) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State/2254). Filing fee received: $ 5.00, receipt number 0970-17882560 filed by Walter James Van, Jr. (Storts, Brick) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(MYE) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
