Handy v. Pima County Jail
| Alex Lorenzo Handy |
| Pima County Jail and Centurion Medical |
| 4:2020cv00098 |
| March 9, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Pro Se (Tucson) |
| David C Bury |
| Prisoner: Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDERED: The First Amended Complaint (Doc. #7 ) is dismissed for failure to state a claim. Plaintiff has 30 days from the date this Order is filed to file a second amended complaint in compliance with this Order. If Plaintiff fails to comply, the Clerk of Court must, without further notice, enter a judgment of dismissal of this action with prejudice that states that the dismissal may count as a "strike" under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g) and deny any pending unrelated motions as moot. The Clerk of Court must mail Plaintiff a court-approved form for filing a civil rights complaint by a prisoner. Signed by Senior Judge David C Bury on 4/20/2020. (MCO)
|
| Filing 7 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Centurion Medical filed by Alex Lorenzo Handy. (7 pages) (MCO) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER FOR PAYMENT OF INMATE FILING FEE: IT IS ORDERED The Director of the Arizona Department of Corrections or his/her designee must collect $350 filing fee from Plaintiff's trust account in monthly payments of 20% of the preceding month's income credited to the account. Payments to be forwarded to the Clerk of Court each time the amount in the account exceeds $10. Payments must be clearly identified by the name and number assigned to this action. The Director of the Arizona Department of Corrections or designee must notify the Clerk in writing when Plaintiff is released or transferred to a correctional institution other than the Arizona State Prison Complex-Yuma. Clerk must serve by mail a copy of this Order on the Director of the Arizona Department of Corrections, 1601 West Jefferson, Phoenix, Arizona, 85007, and must forward a copy to The Clerk of Court must forward a copy of this Order to Financial Administration for the Tucson Division of the United States District Court for the District of Arizona. Signed by Senior Judge David C Bury on 3/16/20. (BAC)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER: IT IS ORDERED Plaintiff's #2 Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is GRANTED. As required by the accompanying Order to the appropriate government agency, Plaintiff must pay $350 filing fee and is not assessed an initial partial filing fee. The #1 Complaint is dismissed for failure to state a claim. Plaintiff has 30 days from the date this Order is filed to file a first amended complaint in compliance with this Order. Failure to comply will result in, without further notice, a judgment of dismissal of this action with prejudice that states that the dismissal may count as a "strike" under 28 USC 1915(g) and denial of any pending unrelated motions as moot. Clerk must mail Plaintiff a court-approved form for filing a civil rights complaint by a prisoner. Signed by Senior Judge David C Bury on 3/16/20.(BAC)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (ARC) |
| Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Alex Lorenzo Handy. (4 pages) (ARC) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Alex Lorenzo Handy. (2 pages) (ARC) |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed by Alex Lorenzo Handy. (6 pages) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(ARC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
