Bostic v. Von Blankensee
| David Ryan Bostic |
| M Von Blankensee |
| 4:2020cv00182 |
| April 27, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Jacqueline M Rateau (PS) |
| David C Bury |
| Prisoner: Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER: IT IS ORDERED Petitioner's #6 Notice is granted to the extent that the Court will grant Petitioner an extension of time to comply with the 4/30/20 Order. To the extent that the Notice seeks any other relief, it is denied. Within 30 days of the date this Order is filed, Petitioner must either pay $5 filing fee or file a complete Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Failure to comply will result in a judgment of dismissal of this action without prejudice and without further notice to Petitioner. Clerk of Court must mail Petitioner the current court-approved form for filing an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Habeas). Signed by Senior Judge David C Bury on 6/23/20. (BAC)
|
| Filing 6 Notice/Request for Information by Petitioner David Ryan Bostic. (1 page). (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(BAC) |
| Filing 5 AMENDED PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Fed/2241) filed by David Ryan Bostic. (13 pages) (KAH) |
| Filing 4 Party agrees to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction in Habeas Case. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MYE) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER: IT IS ORDERED within 30 days of the date this Order is filed, Petitioner must either pay $5 filing fee or file a complete Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Failure to comply will result in a judgment of dismissal of this action without prejudice and without further notice to Petitioner. Petitioner's #1 2241 Petition is dismissed with leave to amend. Petitioner has 30 days from the date of filing of this Order to file an amended 2241 petition in compliance with this Order. Failure to comply will result in a judgment of dismissal of this action, without prejudice, without further notice to Petitioner and denial of any pending unrelated motions as moot. Clerk must mail Petitioner the current court-approved form for filing a "Petition Under 28 USC 2241 For A Writ Of Habeas Corpus By A Person In Federal Custody" and the current court-approved form for filing an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Habeas). Signed by Senior Judge David C Bury on 4/29/20.(BAC)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (DLC) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Fed/2241) filed by David Ryan Bostic. (6 pages) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(DLC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Bostic v. Von Blankensee | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: M Von Blankensee | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: David Ryan Bostic | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
