Rivero v. Titlemax of Arizona Incorporated et al
| Ricardo Rivero |
| Camping Companies Incorporated and Titlemax of Arizona Incorporated |
| 4:2020cv00262 |
| June 18, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Maria S Aguilera |
| Scott H Rash |
| Other Statutes: Other Statutory Actions |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 27, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER granting #12 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Titlemax of Arizona Incorporated shall file its response on or before 8/27/2020. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Maria S Aguilera. (MSA, lm) (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.)
|
| Filing 12 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re: #1 Complaint Titlemax of Arizona, Inc.'s Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint (First Request) by Titlemax of Arizona Incorporated. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(DiGiacomo, Michael) |
| Filing 11 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Camping Companies Incorporated.(Gregory, John) |
| Due to the appointment of a new District Judge in the Tucson Division, this case is hereby reassigned by the Clerk to the Honorable District Judge Scott H. Rash. All future filings shall reflect the following case number CV 20-262-SHR(MSA). |
| Filing 10 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Ricardo Rivero: Proof of Service re: Complaint upon The Camping Companies, Inc. on July 1, 2020. (Thompson, Russell) |
| Filing 9 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Ricardo Rivero: Declaration of Service re: Complaint upon TitleMax of Arizona, Inc. on July 7, 2020. (Thompson, Russell) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that this case is referred to Magistrate Judge Maria S Aguilera for all pretrial proceedings and report and recommendation in accordance with the provisions of 28 USC 636(b)(1) and LR Civ. 72.1 and 72.2. All future filings in this case shall be designated: CV-20-0262-TUC-JGZ (MSA). Signed by Judge Jennifer G Zipps on 6/25/20.(BAC)
|
| Filing 7 Minute Order: Pursuant to Local Rule 3.7(b), a request has been received for a random reassignment of this case to a District Judge. IT IS ORDERED this Case is reassigned by random draw to District Judge Jennifer G Zipps. All further pleadings/papers should now list the following COMPLETE case number: CV-20-262-TUC-JGZ. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (DLC) |
| Filing 6 Party Elects Assignment of Case to District Judge Jurisdiction. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (DLC) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Titlemax of Arizona Incorporated, and Camping Companies Incorporated. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(MYE). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
| Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-18396027. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Maria S Aguilera. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-20-262-TUC-MSA. Magistrate Election form attached. (MYE) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Ricardo Rivero. (Thompson, Russell) (Attachments: #1 Summons)(MYE) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-18396027 filed by Ricardo Rivero. (Thompson, Russell) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(MYE) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
