Shipley v. USA
| Marc Ryan Shipley, Marc R Shipley and Marc Shipley |
| USA |
| 4:2020cv00268 |
| June 22, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Pro Se (Tucson) |
| David C Bury |
| Prisoner: Vacate Sentence - Habeas Corpus |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
Service Order (2255) The Clerk of Court must electronically serve a copy of the 2255 Motion (Doc. 1 in CV 20-00268-TUC-DCB) and this Order on the United States Attorney for the District of Arizona via electronic mail. The parties and the Clerk of Court must file all documents related to the 2255 Motion in the civil case. The United States Attorney for the District of Arizona or his designee has 60 days from the date of service within which to answer the 2255 Motion. Movant may file a reply within 30 days from the date of service of the answer to the 2255 Motion. (Review ORDER for complete details). Signed by Senior Judge David C Bury on 8/19/2020. (Attachments: #1 2255 Motion, #2 Memorandum)(MCO)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (MCO) |
| Filing 1 MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (2255) re: Criminal Case No CR 16-1061-TUC-DCB(JR) filed by Marc Ryan Shipley. ( 35 pages ) (Attachments: #1 Memorandum, #2 Envelope)(MCO) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
