Underwood v. Moss et al
| Abdul Mahaddie Underwood |
| Trinity Food Service Incorporated, Unknown Millhoff, Unknown Bonorand, Chaplain Moss, David Shinn, Chaplain Herman, Unknown Moss and Unknown Herman |
| 4:2020cv00381 |
| September 4, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Pro Se (Tucson) |
| Raner C Collins |
| Prisoner: Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER FOR PAYMENT OF INMATE FILING FEE Directing Monthly Payments be made from Prison Account of Abdul Mahaddie Underwood. Signed by Senior Judge Raner C Collins on 10/8/2020. (ARC)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDERED: Plaintiff's second Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. #5 ) is granted. As required by the accompanying Order to the appropriate government agency, Plaintiff must pay the $350.00 filing fee and is assessed an initial partial filing fee of $97.46. Counts Two and Three are dismissed without prejudice. Defendants Moss, Shinn, Bonorand, and Millhoff are dismissed without prejudice. Defendants Trinity Food Services and Herman must answer Counts One and Four. The Clerk of Court must send Plaintiff a service packet including the Complaint (Doc. #1 ), this Order, and both summons and request for waiver forms for Defendants Trinity Food Services and Herman. Plaintiff must complete and return the service packet to the Clerk of Court within 21 days of the date of filing of this Order. If Plaintiff does not either obtain a waiver of service of the summons or complete service of the Summons and Complaint on a Defendant within 90 days of the filing of the Complaint or within 60 days of the filing of this Order, whichever is later, the action may be dismissed as to each Defendant not served. Signed by Senior Judge Raner C Collins on 10/8/2020. (ARC)
|
|
Filing 6
Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Abdul Mahaddie Underwood. (3 pages) (ARC)
|
|
Filing 5
APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Abdul Mahaddie Underwood. (2 pages) (ARC)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDERED Plaintiff's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. #2 ) is denied without prejudice. Within 30 days of the date this Order is filed, Plaintiff must either pay the $350.00 filing fee and $50.00 administrative fee or file a complete Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and a certified six-month trust account statement. If Plaintiff fails to either pay the $350.00 filing fee and $50.00 administrative fee or file a complete Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis within 30 days, the Clerk of Court must enter a judgment of dismissal of this action without prejudice and without further notice to Plaintiff and deny any pending unrelated motions as moot. Signed by Senior Judge Raner C Collins on 9/8/20. (MYE)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (SCA)
|
|
Filing 2
*APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Abdul Mahaddie Underwood. (2 pages) (SCA) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/8/2020: #1 Corrected IFP) (CEI). *Modified to indicate case number missing from main document; corrected pdf added on 9/8/2020 (CEI).
|
|
Filing 1
*PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed by Abdul Mahaddie Underwood. (23 pages) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(SCA) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/8/2020: #2 Corrected Complaint) (CEI). *Modified to indicate case number missing from main document; corrected pdf added on 9/8/2020 (CEI).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
