Wilson v. Ducey et al
| Darquine Wilson |
| Doug Ducey and Attorney General of the State of Arizona |
| 4:2020cv00388 |
| September 10, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Eric J Markovich (PS) |
| Raner C Collins |
| Prisoner: Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 CLERK'S JUDGMENT - IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that pursuant to the Court's Order filed September 29, 2020, judgment and this action is hereby dismissed without prejudice. (MCO) |
Filing 5
ORDER DISMISSING CASE, Petitioner's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. #2 ) is denied as moot. Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. #1 ) and this action are dismissed without prejudice, and the Clerk of Court must enter judgment accordingly. Pursuant to Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, in the event Petitioner files an appeal, the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability. Signed by Senior Judge Raner C Collins on 9/29/2020. (MCO)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (DLC) |
| Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Darquine Wilson. (3 pages) (DLC) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Darquine Wilson. (2 pages) (DLC) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Fed/2241) filed by Darquine Wilson. (45 pages) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(DLC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
