Buchanan v. Von Blankensen
| Ralph James Buchanan |
| Unknown Von Blankensen |
| 4:2020cv00398 |
| September 17, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Lynnette C Kimmins (PS) |
| David C Bury |
| Prisoner: Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 12, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 MOTION for Extension of Time to Amend #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Fed/2241) by Ralph James Buchanan. (2 pages) (MFR) |
| Filing 8 Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number TUC032538. (MCO) |
Filing 6
ORDERED: Petitioner's Motion and Affidavit for Permission to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. #2 ) is denied. Within 30 days of the date this Order is filed, Petitioner must either pay the $5.00 filing fee or file a complete Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. If Petitioner fails to comply, the Clerk of Court must enter a judgment of dismissal of this action without prejudice and without further notice to Petitioner and deny any pending unrelated motions as moot. Petitioner's Petition (Doc. #1 ) is dismissed with leave to amend. Petitioner has 30 days from the date of filing of this Order to file an amended 2241 petition in compliance with this Order. If Petitioner fails to comply, the Clerk of Court must enter a judgment of dismissal of this action, without prejudice and without further notice to Petitioner and deny any pending unrelated motions as moot. Petitioner's Request for Hearing on Motion for Appointment of Counsel (Doc. #4 ) is denied. The Clerk of Court must mail Petitioner the current court-approved form for filing a "Petition Under 28 U.S.C. 2241 For A Writ Of Habeas Corpus By A Person In Federal Custody" and the current court-approved form for filing an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Habeas). Review attached ORDER for details. Signed by Senior Judge David C Bury on 10/6/2020. (MCO)
|
| Filing 7 Party agrees to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction in Habeas Case. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MYE) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (DLC) |
| Filing 4 MOTION (Request) for Hearing on MOTION for Appointment of Counsel by Ralph James Buchanan. (1 page) (DLC) |
| Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Ralph James Buchanan. (2 pages)(DLC) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Ralph James Buchanan. (1 page) (DLC) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Fed/2241) filed by Ralph James Buchanan. (119 pages) (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Interested Persons, #2 Exhibit, #3 Envelope)(DLC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Buchanan v. Von Blankensen | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Ralph James Buchanan | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Unknown Von Blankensen | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
