Carter v. Pima, County of et al
Matthew Gregory Carter |
Centurion of Arizona LLC, Unknown Parties, Mikell Karsten, Winfred Williams, Karl Woolridge, C Binnion, Anita Sellers and Pima, County of |
4:2020cv00408 |
September 24, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Pro Se (Tucson) |
John C Hinderaker |
Scott H Rash |
Prisoner: Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 ORDER that the parties' stipulation (Doc. #10 ) is granted. The deadline for Defendants Centurion Health Services, LLC, Anita Sellers, RN, Mikell Karsten, MD and Winfred Williams, MD to file an answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's complaint is extended to 12/17/2020. Signed by Judge John C Hinderaker on 11/10/2020. (MFR) |
Filing 10 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT re: #1 Complaint by Centurion of Arizona LLC, Mikell Karsten, Anita Sellers, Winfred Williams. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Barnes, Sarah) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Sarah Lynn Barnes on behalf of Centurion of Arizona LLC, Mikell Karsten, Anita Sellers, Winfred Williams. (Barnes, Sarah) |
Filing 8 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Matthew Gregory Carter: Affidavit of Service re: Complaint, Summons, Civil Cover Sheet, Order upon Dr. Mikell Karsten on 11/05/2020. (Eidenbach, Kirstin) |
Filing 7 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Matthew Gregory Carter: Affidavit of Service re: Complaint, Summons, Civil Cover Sheet, Order upon Dr. Winfred Williams on 10/19/2020. (Eidenbach, Kirstin) |
Filing 6 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Matthew Gregory Carter: Affidavit of Service re: Complaint, Summons, Civil Cover Sheet, Order upon Anita Sellers on 10/18/2020. (Eidenbach, Kirstin) |
Due to the appointment of a new District Judge in the Tucson Division, this case is hereby reassigned by the Clerk to the Honorable District Judge John C Hinderaker. All future filings shall reflect the following case number CV 20-408-JCH. |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Mikell Karsten, Anita Sellers, Winfred Williams. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(MCO). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
Filing 4 ORDERED: Counts Two, Three, and Five are dismissed without prejudice. Defendants Pima County, Centurion, Woolridge, Binnion, John and Jane Does 1-6, and Corporations A-G are dismissed without prejudice. Defendants Sellers, Karsten, and Williams must answer Counts One and Four. Plaintiff must either serve Defendants Sellers, Karsten, and Williams or seek a waiver of service for each Defendants. Defendants Sellers, Karsten, and Williams must answer the relevant portions of the Complaint or otherwise respond by appropriate motion within the time provided by the applicable provisions of Rule 12(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Clerk of Court must issue the proposed Summonses filed at Docs. 2, 2-1, and 2-2 for Defendants Williams, Karsten, and Sellers. See attached order for details. Signed by Judge Scott H Rash on 10/13/2020. (MCO) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (SCA). |
Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Matthew Gregory Carter. (Miller, Audrey) (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons, #6 Summons)(SCA) |
Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-18705354 filed by Matthew Gregory Carter. (Miller, Audrey) (12 pages) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(SCA). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.