Kasic v. Shinn
Petitioner: Mark Noriki Kasic
Respondent: David Shinn and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Case Number: 4:2020cv00434
Filed: October 12, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: Jacqueline M Rateau (PS)
Referring Judge: Raner C Collins
2 Judge: Jacqueline M Rateau
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 17, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDERED that Petitioner's motion #8 is hereby GRANTED, and that this proceeding is STAYED until the resolution of certiorari review and the issuance of the Arizona Supreme Court's mandate in State v. Kasic, Ariz. Sup. Ct. No. CR-19-0379-PR. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that counsel for Petitioner shall notify this Court via supplemental pleading following the completion of certiorari review and the issuance of the mandate. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Respondent shall have 30 days from the date of the dissolution of the stay to respond to Petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline M Rateau on 11/16/20. (MYE)
November 12, 2020 Filing 10 Party agrees to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction in Habeas Case. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MYE)
November 12, 2020 Filing 9 NOTICE re: Supplemental Document by Mark Noriki Kasic . (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Form CJA 23)(Kooistra, John)
November 12, 2020 Filing 8 MOTION to Stay by Mark Noriki Kasic. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Kooistra, John)
November 4, 2020 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Jim D Nielsen on behalf of Attorney General of the State of Arizona, David Shinn. (Nielsen, Jim)
October 28, 2020 Filing 6 Notice of Receipt of Electronic Service of Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Arizona Attorney General on 10/27/20. The Attorney General's Office will file a Notice of Appearance within five (5) business days that identifies the respondents that are represented or, in the alternative, will notify the Court if the Attorney General is not able to accept service for and/or represent any of the named respondents. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (Nielsen, Jim)
October 27, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Arizona Attorney General Service Order (2254): The Clerk of Court must add the Arizona Attorney General as an additional Respondent. Petitioner's motion for appointment of counsel (Doc. #3 ) is granted. Counsel are appointed pursuant to the Criminal Justice Act, 18 U.S.C. 3006A(a)(2)(B) and 28 U.S.C. 2254(h). The Clerk of Court must serve a copy of the Petition (Doc. 1) and this Order on the Respondent and the Attorney General of the State of Arizona by electronic mail pursuant to Rule 4, Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, and the Memorandum of Understanding between the United States District Clerk of Court for the District of Arizona and the Arizona Attorney General's Office. Within 2 business days, the Attorney General's Office will acknowledge receipt of the Petition and the Court's Order and within 5 business days will either file a notice of appearance on behalf of Respondents or will notify the Court of the names of the Respondents on whose behalf the Arizona Attorney General's Office will not accept service of process. Respondents must answer the Petition within 40 days of the date of service. Petitioner may file a reply within 30 days from the date of service of the answer. This matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Jacqueline M. Rateau pursuant to Rules 72.1 and 72.2 of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure for further proceedings and a report and recommendation. Signed by Senior Judge Raner C Collins on 10/26/20. (Attachments: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, #2 Exhibit 1-5, #3 Exhibit 6, #4 Exhibit 7-8, #5 Exhibit 9-11, #6 Exhibit 12-17, #7 Exhibit 18-23, #8 Exhibit 24-25)(MYE)
October 26, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDERED that the Motion to Appoint Counsel #3 is GRANTED and Sam Kooistra is hereby appointed to represent petitioner in these proceedings. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline M Rateau on 10/26/20. (MYE)
October 13, 2020 Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Mark Noriki Kasic. (Kooistra, John)
October 12, 2020 Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (SCA)
October 12, 2020 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State/2254). Filing fee received: $ 5.00, receipt number 0970-18763737 filed by Mark Noriki Kasic. (241 pages) (Kooistra, John) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3)(SCA)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kasic v. Shinn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: David Shinn
Represented By: Jim D Nielsen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Represented By: Jim D Nielsen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Mark Noriki Kasic
Represented By: John Samuel Kooistra
Represented By: Amy Sara Armstrong
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?