Reed v. Trinity Services Group Incorporated et al
| Kenneth W Reed |
| Trinity Services Group Incorporated, Unknown Barr, Unknown Gaye, K Muko, Unknown Parties, P Tuozzo, Ruben Montano, David Merriman, Unknown Jones, Unknown Urrea, L Valisto and Charles L Ryan |
| 4:2020cv00522 |
| November 25, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Pro Se (Tucson) |
| Raner C Collins |
| Prisoner: Prison Condition |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 6, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER: IT IS ORDERED Plaintiff's #6 "Motion to Correct Clerical Error-Wrong Venue" is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court must transfer this case to the Phoenix Division for reassignment pursuant to Local Rule of Civil Procedure 3.7(e). The Clerk of Court must transfer to the Phoenix Division any subsequently filed documents in this this action that are filed in the Tucson Division. Signed by Senior Judge Raner C Collins on 1/5/21. (BAC)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER GRANTING #3 , #4 Motions to Substitute Counsel. IT IS ORDERED Paul E Carter of the Attorney General's Office is terminated as counsel of record, and Randy J Aoyama and Bradley L Dunn of Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP be substituted as counsel of record for Defendant Merriman. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED Alexander B Chosid of TKC Holdings Incorporated is terminated as counsel of record, and Randy J Aoyama and Bradley L Dunn of Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP shall be substituted as counsel of record for the Defendant Trinity Services. The Clerk of the Court shall amend the docket accordingly. Signed by Senior Judge Raner C Collins on 1/5/21. (BAC)
|
| Filing 7 Joinder re: #1 Notice of Removal (Defendant Trinity's Joinder in or Consent to Removal) by Defendant Trinity Services Group Incorporated. (Aoyama, Randy) *Modified docket text for clarity on 1/5/2021 (KAH). |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Transfer Case to Phoenix Division by Kenneth W Reed. (3 pages) (ARC) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Remand to State Court by Kenneth W Reed. (3 pages) (ARC) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Substitute Attorney by Trinity Services Group Incorporated. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Aoyama, Randy) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Substitute Attorney by David Merriman. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Consent of David Merriman, #2 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Aoyama, Randy) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (ARC) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Pima County Superior Court, case number C20195670. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-18919540 filed by David Merriman.(Carter, Paul) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Exhibit, #8 Exhibit, #9 Exhibit, #10 Exhibit, #11 Exhibit)(ARC) |
| ***STATE COURT RECORDS RECEIVED*** SERVICE EXECUTED : Waiver of Service of Summons by Trinity Services Group Incorporated. (Original filed in Pima County Superior Court on 3/9/2020) (ARC) This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. |
| ***STATE COURT RECORDS RECEIVED*** ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by Trinity Services Group Incorporated. (Original filed in Pima County Superior Court on 5/5/2020); Answer by David Merriman with Jury Demand.(Original filed in Pima County Superior Court on 11/19/2020))***ENTERED IN DISTRICT COURT FOR CASE MANAGEMENT PURPOSES***(ARC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
