Loreto v. Cochise County Superior Court et al
Jesus Ernesto Loreto, Jr. |
Arizona, State of and Cochise County Superior Court |
4:2020cv00553 |
December 22, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Bruce G Macdonald |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 NOTICE by Jesus Ernesto Loreto, Jr. (6 pages)(BAC) |
Filing 7 Agreement to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Party agrees to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAC) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANT re informational documents attached: (1) Notice to Self-Represented Litigant, (2) Federal Court Self-Service Clinic Flyer, (3) Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2, and (4) Notice and Request re Electronic Noticing. (ARC) |
Filing 4 This case has been assigned to the Honorable Bruce G Macdonald. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-20-553-TUC-BGM. Magistrate Election form attached. (ARC) |
Filing 3 AFFIDAVIT or DECLARATION in Support of #2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Plaintiff Jesus Ernesto Loreto, Jr. (ARC) |
Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Jesus Ernesto Loreto, Jr. (ARC) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT (named as a Petition for Writ of Certiorari) filed by Jesus Ernesto Loreto, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(ARC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.