Jefferson v. Heisner et al
Plaintiff: Ricardo James Jefferson, Jr.
Defendant: A Loruto, Unknown Heisner and Unknown Olson
Case Number: 4:2021cv00054
Filed: December 18, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: Pro Se (Tucson)
Referring Judge: Rosemary Marquez
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 24, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER FOR PAYMENT OF INMATE FILING FEE Directing Monthly Payments be made from Prison Account of Ricardo James Jefferson, Jr. Signed by Judge Rosemary Marquez on 3/4/21. (MYE)
March 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER (Service Packet): Plaintiff's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. #5 ) is granted. As required by the accompanying Order to the appropriate government agency, Plaintiff must pay the $350.00 filing fee and is assessed an initial partial filing fee of $29.60. Defendants Loruto and Olson are dismissed without prejudice. Defendant Heisner must answer Counts One, Two, and Three. The Clerk of Court must send Plaintiff a service packet including the Complaint (Doc. 2), this Order, and both summons and request for waiver forms for Defendant Heisner. Plaintiff must complete and return the service packet to the Clerk of Court within 21 days of the date of filing of this Order. If Plaintiff does not either obtain a waiver of service of the summons or complete service of the Summons and Complaint on a Defendant within 90 days of the filing of the Complaint or within 60 days of the filing of this Order, whichever is later, the action may be dismissed as to each Defendant not served. Signed by Judge Rosemary Marquez on 3/4/21. (See attached Order for complete details.)(MYE)
February 22, 2021 Filing 6 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Ricardo James Jefferson, Jr. (2 pages) (MYE)
February 22, 2021 Filing 5 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Ricardo James Jefferson, Jr. (2 pages) (MYE)
February 8, 2021 Filing 4 AMENDED NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (ARC)
February 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 *ORDERED: This case is severed into individual actions, one for each Plaintiff. The Clerk of Court must assign a new case number to each new individual action. The Clerk of Court must close this case (CV 20-00550-TUC-JCH) and enter judgment accordingly. The Clerk of Court must file a copy of the Complaint (Doc. 1 ) in each new case and a copy of Plaintiff Cozad's Applications to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Docs. 2, 5 ) in the new case opened on his behalf. These documents must be deemed filed as of December 18, 2020. The Clerk of Court must mail a copy of the relevant newly filed complaint to each individual Plaintiff. Within 30 days of the date this Order is filed, Plaintiffs Jefferson, McCoy, Olson, Groom, Urrea-Moreno, Montoya, and Makowski must, in their new individual cases, either pay the $350.00 filing fee and $52.00 administrative fee or file a complete Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and a certified six-month trust account statement. If Plaintiffs Jefferson, McCoy, Olson, Groom, Urrea-Moreno, Montoya, and Makowski fail to either pay the $350.00 filing fee and $52.00 administrative fee or file a complete Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis within 30 days, the Clerk of Court must enter a judgment of dismissal of the relevant action without prejudice and without further notice to Plaintiff and must deny any pending unrelated motions as moot. The Clerk of Court must mail Plaintiffs Jefferson, McCoy, Olson, Groom, Urrea-Moreno, Montoya, and Makowski a court-approved form for filing an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Non-Habeas). The individual Plaintiffs must proceed independently from this point and will not be regarded as co-plaintiffs, except upon further order of the Court. All further pleadings, motions or other papers submitted for filing by an individual Plaintiff in his separate case must be signed by the individual Plaintiff, or they will be stricken. Signed by Judge John C Hinderaker on 2/4/2021. (ARC) *Modified file date from 2/4/21 to 2/5/21; NEF regenerated on 2/8/2021 (CEI).
February 4, 2021 Filing 3 AMENDED by Doc. #4 - NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (ARC) Modified on 2/8/2021 (ARC).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jefferson v. Heisner et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: A Loruto
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unknown Heisner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unknown Olson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ricardo James Jefferson, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?