Baker et al v. Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company et al
| Biff Baker Fence Incorporated, Robert Baker and William J Baker |
| Unknown Parties, Dennis McEvoy, Jane Doe McEvoy, Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company and Unknown McEvoy |
| 4:2021cv00064 |
| February 5, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Jennifer G Zipps |
| Contract: Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1391 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTY OF DEFICIENCY RE: CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT: Pursuant to FRCiv 7.1 and LRCiv 7.1.1 the attached Corporate Disclosure Statement form must be filed by all nongovernmental corporate parties with their first appearance. A supplemental statement must be filed upon any change in the information. In addition, if not already filed, the Corporate Disclosure Statement should be filed within 14 days. Corporate Disclosure Statement Deadline set as to Biff Baker Fence Incorporated. (SVC) |
Filing 7
NOTICE TO THE PARTIES: THE PARTIES ARE ADVISED that motions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) are discouraged if the defect can be cured by filing an amended pleading. The parties must meet and confer prior to the filing of such motions to determine whether it can be avoided. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs serve a copy of this Order upon Defendants and file a notice of service. See attached Order for complete details. Signed by Judge Jennifer G Zipps on 2/9/21. (MYE)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: Complaint Document not in compliance with LRCiv 7.1(a)(3) - Party names must be capitalized using proper upper and lower case type. No further action is required. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (REM) |
| Filing 6 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-19136922. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Jennifer G. Zipps. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-21-00064-TUC-JGZ. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (REM) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTY OF DEFICIENCY RE: CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT: Pursuant to FRCiv 7.1 and LRCiv 7.1.1 the attached Corporate Disclosure Statement form must be filed by all nongovernmental corporate parties with their first appearance. A supplemental statement must be filed upon any change in the information. In addition, if not already filed, the Corporate Disclosure Statement should be filed within 14 days. Corporate Disclosure Statement Deadline set as to Biff Baker Fence Incorporated. (REM) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: Incomplete Summons Forms submitted #2 . Forms missing case caption names, defendant's name, address and plaintiff or plaintiff's attorney name, address. FOLLOW-UP ACTION REQUIRED: Please refile corrected document. Deficiency must be corrected within one business day of this notice. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (REM) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Robert Baker, William J Baker, Biff Baker Fence Incorporated. (Nolasco, Thomas) (Attachments: #1 Summons)(REM) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 402.00, receipt number 0970-19136922filed by William J Baker, Biff Baker Fence Incorporated, Robert Baker.(Nolasco, Thomas) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(REM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
