Hoffman et al v. Cincinnati Insurance Company et al
| David Hoffman and Molly Hoffman |
| Kathy Kerr, Unknown Parties and Cincinnati Insurance Company |
| 4:2021cv00106 |
| March 11, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| John C Hinderaker |
| Contract: Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
ORDERED that the parties' stipulation (Doc. #14 ) is granted. Plaintiffs' reply in support of their motion to remand is extended thirty (30) days from May 5, 2021 to June 4, 2021. Signed by Judge John C Hinderaker on 5/5/2021. (ARC)
|
| Filing 14 First MOTION for Extension of Time Stipulation to Extend Time for Plaintiff's Reply to Defendant's Response to Motion by Cincinnati Insurance Company, Kathy Kerr. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Petersen, Andrew) |
|
Filing 13
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER: Initial disclosures required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a) shall be exchanged no later than May 28, 2021. Discovery due by 1/28/2022. Dispositive motions due by 3/28/2022. Signed by Judge John C Hinderaker on 4/30/2021. (See attached Order for complete details)(DLC)
|
| Filing 12 MINUTE ENTRY for proceedings held before Judge John C. Hinderaker: Scheduling Conference held in chambers on 4/28/2021. The Court discusses the discovery dispute process with the parties. The Court will include Rule 502(d) language in the scheduling order that tracks the language in the rule. The deadlines proposed by the parties will be accepted except the Court will set the deadline for face to face settlement discussions as February 28, 2022 and set the deadline for dispositive motions as March 28, 2022. In light of no objection from either party, the Court will include language to the effect that the deadlines in the scheduling order will remain in effect unless and until the state court enters a scheduling order if the pending motion to remand is granted. Formal scheduling order to follow. APPEARANCES: Telephonic appearance by M. Jay Felix for Plaintiffs. Telephonic appearance by Andrew Petersen for Defendants. Hearing held 10:31 AM to 10:39 AM. A Court Reporter is not present nor are the proceedings placed on the record. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (SSG) |
| Filing 11 RESPONSE to Motion re: #8 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Cincinnati Insurance Company. (Petersen, Andrew) |
| Filing 10 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting by Cincinnati Insurance Company, Kathy Kerr. (Petersen, Andrew) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #8 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Molly Hoffman, David Hoffman. Document not in compliance with LRCiv 7.1(a)(3) - Party names must be capitalized using proper upper and lower case type. No further action is required. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (DLC) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Remand to State Court by David Hoffman, Molly Hoffman. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1 - Declaration of Molly Hoffman, #2 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Mercaldo, Marco) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER Pursuant to Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a Case Management Conference is set for Wednesday, April 28, 2021, at 10:30 a.m. The conference will be held telephonically in chambers. The parties are expected to comply fully with the Federal and Local Rules of Civil Procedure and to minimize the expense of discovery if they do not elect an expedited trial. Signed by Judge John C Hinderaker on 3/12/2021. (See attached Order for complete details)(DLC)
|
| Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Cincinnati Insurance Company, Kathy Kerr.(Petersen, Andrew) |
| Filing 5 Additional Attachments to Main Document re: #1 Notice of Removal by Defendants Cincinnati Insurance Company, Kathy Kerr. (Attachments: #1 Supplement)(Petersen, Andrew) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #1 Notice of Removal filed by Kathy Kerr, Cincinnati Insurance Company. Pursuant to the Electronic Case Filing Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual Section II(B), attorneys are required to submit the automated Civil Cover Sheet when filing a new case. FOLLOW-UP ACTION REQUIRED: Please file an automated Civil Cover Sheet and a Supplemental Cover Sheet. Deficiency must be corrected within one business day of this notice. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAC) |
| Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-19245816. This case has been assigned to the Honorable John C Hinderaker. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-21-00106-TUC-JCH. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (BAC) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Cincinnati Insurance Company. (Petersen, Andrew) (BAC) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Pima County Superior Court, case number C20210672. Filing fee received: $402.00, receipt number 0970-19245816 filed by Kathy Kerr, Cincinnati Insurance Company. (Petersen, Andrew) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B)(BAC) |
| ***STATE COURT RECORDS RECEIVED***SERVICE EXECUTED: Rule 4 Waiver of Service of Summons. Waiver signed on 2/18/21 as to Cincinnati Insurance Company, Kathy Kerr. (BAC) This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
