Medina #268030 v. Shinn et al
| Dominic Alfred Medina |
| Unknown Barsutos, Jullie Roberts, Unknown Pacheco, D Lewis, Unknown Higgenson, Unknown De La Cruz, Carlos Reyna, Travis Scott, Unknown Estrada, Lance Uehling, Robert Brier, E Flores, P Days, David Shinn, Stacy Crabtree, J Valenzuela, Unknown Apple and G Figueroa |
| 4:2021cv00204 |
| May 14, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Pro Se (Tucson) |
| Jennifer G Zipps |
| Prisoner: Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Appointment of Counsel (Doc. #8 ) is DENIED without prejudice. Signed by Judge Jennifer G Zipps on 7/7/21. (MYE)
|
| Filing 8 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel by Dominic Alfred Medina. (2 pages) (MYE) |
|
Filing 7
ORDERED: All Defendants EXCEPT Defendant Shinn are dismissed without prejudice. Defendant Shinn, in his official capacity as ADC Director, must answer the Complaint or otherwise respond by appropriate motion within the time provided by the applicable provisions of Rule 12(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Clerk of Court must send Plaintiff a service packet including the Complaint (Doc. #1 ), this Order, and both summons and request for waiver forms for Defendant Shinn. Plaintiff must complete and return the service packet to the Clerk of Court within 21 days of the date of filing of this Order. The United States Marshal will not provide service of process if Plaintiff fails to comply with this Order.If Plaintiff does not either obtain a waiver of service of the summons or complete service of the Summons and Complaint on a Defendant within 90 days of the filing of the Complaint or within 60 days of the filing of this Order, whichever is later, the action may be dismissed. Signed by Judge Jennifer G Zipps on 6/11/2021. (See Order for complete details)(ARC)
|
| Filing 6 Filing fee: $ 402.00, receipt number TUC033122. (MYE) |
|
Filing 5
ORDERED Within 30 days of the date this Order is filed, Plaintiff must either pay the $350.00 filing fee and $52.00 administrative fee or file a complete Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and a certified six-month trust account statement. If Plaintiff fails to either pay the $350.00 filing fee and $52.00 administrative fee or file a complete Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis within 30 days, the Clerk of Court must enter a judgment of dismissal of this action without prejudice and without further notice to Plaintiff and deny any pending unrelated motions as moot. The Clerk of Court must mail Plaintiff a court-approved form for filing an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Non-Habeas). Signed by Judge Jennifer G Zipps on 5/21/21. (MYE)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE re: Fed.R.Civ.P 5.2 Privacy Protection Guidelines. (MYE) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE: This case is subject to General Order 14-17, which supersedes General Order 14-14. (Attachments: #1 E-Filing Instructions)(MYE) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (MYE) |
| Filing 1 *PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed by Dominic Alfred Medina. (34 pages)(MYE) (Additional attachment(s) added on 5/14/2021: #1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT with case number) (MYE). *Modified to add complaint with case number on 5/14/2021 (MYE); Modified to remove case participants/public terminals document restriction on doc 1-1 on 5/17/2021 (CEI). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
