Buchanan v Howard
| Ralph James Buchanan, Jr., Daniel Gill and Vincent DeMarco |
| Catricia Howard |
| 4:2021cv00247 |
| June 17, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| David C Bury |
| Lynnette C Kimmins |
| Prisoner: Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 USCA Case Number re: #6 Notice of Appeal. Case number 21-16304, 9th CCA. (Copies sent by Ninth Circuit.) (KAH) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEAL to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals re: #4 Order, #5 Clerks Judgment by Ralph James Buchanan, Jr. (1 page) (KAH) |
| Filing 5 CLERK'S JUDGMENT - IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that pursuant to the Court's order filed July 6, 2021, Petitioner's Petition Under 28 U.S.C. 2241 and this case are dismissed. (DLC) |
Filing 4
ORDER Petitioner's Petition Under 28 U.S.C. 2241 (Doc. #1 ) and this case are dismissed. The Clerk of Court must enter judgment accordingly and close this case. The Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability. Signed by Senior Judge David C Bury on 7/6/2021. (DLC)
|
| Filing 3 Party agrees to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction in Habeas Case. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MYE) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (REM) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Fed/2241) filed by Ralph James Buchanan, Jr.(23 pages) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(REM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
