Alcoser #120473 v. Shinn et al
Joseph Anthony Alcoser |
David Shinn, Unknown Estrada, Jullie Roberts, Lance Uehling, Carlos Reyna, Unknown Barsutos, J Valenzuela, Unknown Higgenson, Unknown Pacheco, Travis Scott, Panann Days, David Lewis, E Flores and Stacy Crabtree |
4:2021cv00269 |
July 8, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Pro Se (Tucson) |
Cindy K Jorgenson |
Prisoner: Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 24, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 10 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Joseph Anthony Alcoser. (10 pages) (MCO) |
Filing 9 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Joseph Anthony Alcoser. (2 pages) (MCO) |
![]() |
Filing 7 NOTICE re: FRCiv 5.2 Privacy Protection Guidelines. (ARC) |
Filing 6 NOTICE: This case is subject to General Order 14-17, which supersedes General Order 14-14. Please see attached Order and Notice. (Attachments: #1 Notice)(ARC) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (ARC) |
Filing 4 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Joseph Anthony Alcoser. (3 pages) (ARC) |
Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Joseph Anthony Alcoser. (7 pages) (ARC) |
Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Joseph Anthony Alcoser. (2 pages) (ARC) |
Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed by Joseph Anthony Alcoser. (16 pages)(ARC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.