Monterroso v. Diaz Delivery Services LLC et al
| Juan Monterroso |
| Diaz Delivery Services LLC, Roberto Diaz and Unknown Diaz |
| 4:2021cv00292 |
| July 22, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Scott H Rash |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Settlement by Juan Monterroso. (Bendau, Clifford) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Jane Doe Diaz, Roberto Diaz, Diaz Delivery Services LLC. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(JAM). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
| Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-19693738. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Scott H Rash. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-21-292-TUC-SHR. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (JAM) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Juan Monterroso. (Bendau, Christopher) (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(JAM) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 402.00, receipt number 0970-19693738 filed by Juan Monterroso. (Bendau, Christopher) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(JAM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
