Dunlap #124173 v. Shinn et al
| Larry Donnell Dunlap |
| David Shinn and Attorney General of the State of Arizona |
| 4:2021cv00311 |
| August 2, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Eric J Markovich (PS) |
| Raner C Collins |
| Prisoner: Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 USCA Case Number re: #11 Notice of Appeal. Case number 21-16438, 9th CCA. (KAH) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE OF APPEAL to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals re: #9 Order by Larry Donnell Dunlap. (2 pages) (KAH) |
| Filing 10 CLERK'S JUDGMENT - IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that pursuant to the Court's Order filed August 24, 2021, Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U. S. C. 2254 is denied. Petitioner to take nothing and this action is hereby dismissed without prejudice. (ARC) |
Filing 9
ORDERED: Petitioner's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. #6 ) is granted. Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. #1 ) and this action are dismissed without prejudice, and the Clerk of Court must enter judgment accordingly. Petitioner's "Motion for the Emergency Writ of Habeas Corpus Release from the Arizona Department of Corrections... Pending Appeal" (Doc. #8 ) is denied as moot. Pursuant to Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, in the event Petitioner files an appeal, the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability because reasonable jurists would not find the Courts procedural ruling debatable. Signed by Senior Judge Raner C Collins on 8/24/2021. (ARC)
|
| Filing 8 MOTION for the Emergency Writ of Habeas Corpus Release from the Arizona Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and Re-Entry Custody Pending Appeal by Larry Donnell Dunlap. (309 pages) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-14, #2 Exhibit 14-19, #3 Exhibit 19-21, #4 Exhibit 21-25, #5 Exhibit 25-27, #6 Exhibit 27)(ARC) |
| Filing 7 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Larry Donnell Dunlap. (2 pages) (ARC) |
| Filing 6 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Larry Donnell Dunlap. (2 pages) (ARC) |
|
Filing 5
ORDERED: Within 30 days of the date this Order is filed, Petitioner must either pay the $5.00 filing fee or file a complete Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. If Petitioner fails to either pay the $5.00 filing fee or file a complete Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis within 30 days, the Clerk of Court must enter a judgment of dismissal of this action without prejudice and without further notice to Petitioner and deny any pending unrelated motions as moot. The Clerk of Court must mail Petitioner a court-approved form for filing an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Habeas). Signed by Senior Judge Raner C Collins on 8/11/2021. (ARC)
|
| Filing 4 Party agrees to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction in Habeas Case. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MCO) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE: This case is subject to electronic filing as to General Order 14-17, which supersedes General Order 14-14. Please review the attached documents. (Attachments: #1 Instructions)(BAC) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (BAC) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State/2254) filed by Larry Donnell Dunlap. (34 pages) (Attachments: #1 Attachments)(BAC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
