Rodriguez v. Promontory II at Sunrise Homeowners Association Incorporated et al
| Samuel Rodriguez |
| Promontory II at Sunrise Homeowners Association Incorporated, Pinehurst Properties Incorporated, Suzanne F Logan, Unknown Party Logan, Douglas W Glasson, Unknown Party Glasson, Unknown Logan and Unknown Glasson |
| 4:2021cv00315 |
| August 4, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Lynnette C Kimmins |
| Other Statutes: Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 *First MOTION for Extension of Time to File AMENDED COMPLAINT PER ORDER (DOC.10) by Samuel Rodriguez. (Rodriguez, Samuel) *Modified to correct motion type on 10/1/2021 (MYE). |
Filing 12
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE for failure to comply with LRCiv 3.7(b). Show Cause Hearing set for 10/25/2021 at 09:00 AM before Senior Judge Raner C Collins. (Attachments: #1 Consent)(DLC)
|
| Filing 11 Magistrate Election Form resent and deadline reset (x3). (DLC) |
|
Filing 10
ORDERED Rodriguez's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. #3 ) is GRANTED, without prepayment of costs or fees or the necessity of giving security therefore. Rodriguez's Complaint (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE WITH LEAVE TO AMEND, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). Rodriguez shall have until September 30, 2021, to file an Amended Complaint. The Amended Complaint must be clearly designated as "Amended Complaint" on the face of the document. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lynnette C Kimmins on 8/30/21. (See attached Order for complete details.) (MYE)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER granting #4 Motion to Allow Electronic Filing. The party is required to complete the Electronic Case File Registration form to register as a user with the Clerk's Office and to register as a subscriber to PACER (Public Access to Electronic Records) within five (5) days of the date of this Order. See document for complete details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lynnette C Kimmins on 8/30/21. (CKS)
|
| Filing 8 Magistrate Election Form Deadline mailed (x2) on 8/20/21. (BAC) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Service of Plaintiff's First Set of Non-Uniform Interrogatories, Request for Production of Documents and Responses to Questionnaire to President-Director Thalia Kyriakis filed by Samuel Rodriguez. (MYE) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: Document not in compliance with LRCiv 7.1(a)(3) - Party names must be capitalized using proper upper and lower case type. No further action is required. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (REM) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANT re informational documents attached: (1) Notice to Self-Represented Litigant, (2) Federal Court Self-Service Clinic Flyer, (3) Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2, and (4) Notice and Request re Electronic Noticing. (REM) |
| Filing 5 This case has been assigned to the Honorable Lynnette C. Kimmins. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-21-00315-TUC-LCK. Magistrate Election form attached. (REM) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Allow Electronic Filing by a Party Appearing Without an Attorney by Samuel Rodriguez. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(REM) Modified on 8/5/2021 (REM). |
| Filing 3 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Samuel Rodriguez. (REM) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Samuel Rodriguez.(REM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
