Salazar v. Acuity Brands Lighting Incorporated et al
Plaintiff: Kathleen Salazar
Defendant: Acuity Brands Lighting Incorporated, Acuity Brands Technology Services Incorporated, IOTA Engineering Company, Tucson Second Investment Company LLC and Unknown Parties
Case Number: 4:2021cv00349
Filed: September 3, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: David C Bury
Referring Judge: Bruce G Macdonald
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 12, 2021 Filing 10 NOTICE of Service of Discovery filed by Acuity Brands Lighting Incorporated. (Warren, Jeffrey)
November 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 SCHEDULING ORDER: It is hereby ordered that the parties abide by the following schedule and rules: All discovery, including depositions of parties, witnesses, and experts, shall be completed by November 12, 2022. Dispositive motions shall be filed on or before November 18, 2022. Counsel shall file a brief Joint Settlement Status Report (containing no specific settlement terms or offers) on or before February 1, 2022, and every ninety (90) days thereafter. Counsel shall file a Joint Proposed Pretrial Order within thirty (30) days after resolution of the dispositive motions filed at the end of discovery. If no such motions are filed, a Joint Proposed Pretrial Order will be due on or before January 30, 2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bruce G Macdonald on 11/5/2021. (MCO)
November 4, 2021 Filing 8 MINUTE ENTRY for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Bruce G Macdonald: Scheduling Conference held on 11/4/2021. A telephonic Scheduling Conference was held pursuant to Rule 16, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiffs' counsel was not present. Because these cases arise from the same incident and the parties agree to conduct discovery for both cases on the same schedule, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that Judge Soto transfer Acuna v. Acuity Brands Lighting, Inc., No. CV-21-350-TUC-JAS (BGM) to Judge Bury for adjudication with Salazar v. Acuity Brands Lighting, Inc., No. CV-21-349-DCB (BGM). See LRCiv. 42.1. A formal written scheduling order will follow. (Recorded by COURTSMART.) Hearing held 11:50 AM to 12:02 PM. (MCO)
November 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDERED that this action is referred to Magistrate Judge Bruce G. Macdonald for all pretrial proceedings and Report and Recommendation in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1), including the Rule 16 Scheduling Conference on Thursday, November 4, 2021 at 11:40 a.m. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all future filings in this case shall be designated, as follows: CV 21-349 TUC DCB (BGM). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that counsel shall note that the initials in the case caption are extremely important because they determine routing to the proper court of all documents filed in this action. Signed by Senior Judge David C Bury on 10/29/2021. (MCO)
September 3, 2021 Filing 4 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #2 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Acuity Brands Lighting Incorporated, #1 Notice of Removal filed by Acuity Brands Lighting Incorporated. Document not in compliance with LRCiv 7.1(a)(3) - Party names must be capitalized using proper upper and lower case type. No further action is required. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MCO)
September 3, 2021 Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-19831204. This case has been assigned to the Honorable David C Bury. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-21-349-TUC-DCB. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (MCO)
September 3, 2021 Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Acuity Brands Lighting Incorporated identifying Corporate Parent Acuity Brands Lighting Incorporated for Acuity Brands Lighting Incorporated. (Warren, Jeffrey) (MCO)
September 3, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Pima County Superior Court, case number CV20213435. Filing fee received: $ 402.00, receipt number 0970-19831204 filed by Acuity Brands Lighting Incorporated. (Warren, Jeffrey) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit)(MCO)
September 3, 2021 ***STATE COURT RECORDS RECEIVED*** SERVICE EXECUTED : WAIVER of Service of Summons. Waiver received on 8/27/2021 from Acuity Brands Lighting Incorporated, signed by Jeffrey C Warren. (MCO) This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry.

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Salazar v. Acuity Brands Lighting Incorporated et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kathleen Salazar
Represented By: Christopher Leo Sullivan
Represented By: Douglas Randolph Zanes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Acuity Brands Lighting Incorporated
Represented By: Jeffrey Carl Warren
Represented By: Eric M Jenniges
Represented By: Ronald F Negin
Represented By: Scott Busby
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Acuity Brands Technology Services Incorporated
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: IOTA Engineering Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tucson Second Investment Company LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unknown Parties
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?