Marquez v. Howard
| Charles Marquez |
| Catricia Howard |
| 4:2021cv00381 |
| September 24, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| D Thomas Ferraro (PS) |
| Jennifer G Zipps |
| Prisoner: Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 CLERK'S JUDGMENT - IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that pursuant to the Court's Order filed November 19, 2021, Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U. S. C. 2241 is denied. Petitioner to take nothing and this action is hereby dismissed. (ARC) |
Filing 6
ORDERED: Petitioner's Petition Under 28 U.S.C. 2241 (Doc. #1 ) and this case are dismissed. The Clerk of Court must enter judgment accordingly and close this case. Although Petitioner has brought his claims in a 2241 petition, a certificate of appealability is required where a 2241 petition attacks the petitioner's conviction or sentence. See Porter v. Adams, 244 F.3d 1006, 1007 (9th. Cir. 2001). Pursuant to Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing Section 2255 Cases, in the event Movant files an appeal, the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability because reasonable jurists would not find the Court's procedural ruling debatable. Signed by Judge Jennifer G Zipps on 11/19/2021. (ARC)
|
| Filing 5 Filing fee: $5.00, receipt number TUC033631. PAID IN FULL. (ARC) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER: Within 30 days of the date this Order is filed, Petitioner must either pay the $5.00 filing fee or file a complete Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. If Petitioner fails to either pay the $5.00 filing fee or file a complete Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis within 30 days, the Clerk of Court must enter a judgment of dismissal of this action without prejudice and without further notice to Petitioner and deny any pending unrelated motions as moot. The Clerk of Court must mail Petitioner a court-approved form for filing an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Habeas). Signed by Judge Jennifer G Zipps on 10/15/2021. (See attached Order for complete information.)(SCA)
|
| Filing 3 Party agrees to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction in Habeas Case. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MCO) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (MYE) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Fed/2241) filed by Charles Marquez. (10 pages) (Attachments: #1 Appendix A, #2 Envelope)(MYE) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Marquez v. Howard | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Charles Marquez | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Catricia Howard | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
