Ascension Arizona v. Sedgwick Claims Management Services Incorporated et al
Plaintiff: Ascension Arizona doing business as Carondelet St. Joseph's Hospital
Defendant: Sedgwick Claims Management Services Incorporated doing business as Sedgwick Managed Care, Unknown Parties and New Hampshire Insurance Company
Case Number: 4:2021cv00418
Filed: October 13, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: Leslie A Bowman
Referring Judge: David C Bury
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDERED that the motion filed by Defendant Sedgwick Claims Management Services for an extension of time to file an Answer, or other responsive pleading, on or before January 25, 2022 is GRANTED. (Doc. #18 ). Signed by Magistrate Judge Leslie A Bowman on 11/29/21. (JAM)
November 26, 2021 Filing 18 *First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Sedgwick Claims Management Services Incorporated. (Gross, Stewart) *Modified to correct motion type on 11/29/2021 (ARC).
November 12, 2021 Filing 17 *AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Ascension Arizona.(Harvey, Whitney) *Modified to add New Hampshire Insurance Company, a New York Company on 11/15/2021 (MCO).
November 12, 2021 Filing 16 NOTICE of Filing Amended Pleading pursuant to LRCiv 15.1(b) by Ascension Arizona . (Harvey, Whitney)
November 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDERED that this action is referred to Magistrate Judge Leslie A. Bowman for all pretrial proceedings and Report and Recommendation in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all future filings in this case shall be designated, as follows: CV-21-00418-TUC-DCB (LAB). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that counsel shall note that the initials in the case caption are extremely important because they determine routing to the proper court of all documents filed in this action. Signed by Senior Judge David C Bury on 10/29/2021. (MCO)
October 29, 2021 Filing 14 STIPULATION OF PARTIES TO PERMIT PLAINTIFFS TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT AND TO EXTEND THE DUE DATE FOR DEFENDANTS RESPONSIVE PLEADING (First Request) by Ascension Arizona. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Harvey, Whitney)
October 28, 2021 Filing 12 MINUTE ORDER: Pursuant to Local Rule 3.7(b), a request has been received for a random reassignment of this case to a District Judge. IT IS ORDERED this case is reassigned by random draw to Senior District Judge David C Bury. All further pleadings/papers should now list the following COMPLETE case number: CV-21-418-TUC-DCB. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (DLC)
October 27, 2021 Filing 11 Party Elects Assignment of Case to District Judge Jurisdiction. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (DLC)
October 26, 2021 Filing 9 *PLAINTIFF'S DEMAND for Jury Trial by Ascension Arizona. (Harvey, Whitney) *Modified to reflect document is not in compliance with LRCiv 7.1(a)(3) on 10/27/2021 (MCO).
October 26, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER RE: FIRST STIPULATED REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER: IT IS ORDERED that Defendant's motion for an extension of time to file an Answer, or other responsive pleading, is GRANTED. (Doc. #5 ) Defendant shall do so on or before October 29, 2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Leslie A Bowman on 10/26/2021. (MCO)
October 19, 2021 Filing 7 *Corporate Disclosure Statement by Ascension Arizona. (Harvey, Whitney) *Modified to reflect document is not in compliance with LRCiv 7.1(a)(3) on 10/20/2021 (MCO).
October 19, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Whitney M Harvey on behalf of Ascension Arizona. (Harvey, Whitney)
October 19, 2021 Filing 5 *JOINT STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE ANSWER (First Request) - First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Sedgwick Claims Management Services Incorporated. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Gross, Stewart) *Modified to correct event type on 10/19/2021 (MCO).
October 13, 2021 Filing 4 NOTICE TO PARTY RE: CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT: Pursuant to FRCiv 7.1 and LRCiv 7.1.1 the attached Corporate Disclosure Statement form must be filed by all nongovernmental corporate parties with their first appearance. A supplemental statement must be filed upon any change in the information. In addition, if not already filed, the Corporate Disclosure Statement should be filed within 14 days. Corporate Disclosure Statement Deadline set as to Ascension Arizona. (DLC)
October 13, 2021 Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-19961167. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Leslie A Bowman. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-21-418-TUC-LAB. Magistrate Election form attached. PLEASE NOTE: Plaintiff(s) and defendants that have already appeared in this case are required to file the attached Magistrate Election form within FOURTEEN (14) days of this filing. Please read attached instructions. (DLC)
October 13, 2021 Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Sedgwick Claims Management Services Incorporated. (Gross, Stewart) (DLC)
October 13, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Pima County Superior Court, case number C20214100. Filing fee received: $ 402.00, receipt number 0970-19961167 filed by Sedgwick Claims Management Services Incorporated. (Gross, Stewart) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit)(DLC)
October 13, 2021 ***STATE COURT RECORD RECEIVED*** SERVICE EXECUTED: Certificate of Service re: Summons, Complaint, FastStar Certificate upon Sedgwick Claims Management Services Incorporated dba Sedgwick Managed Care c/o CSC, by serving Brooklyn Vanderventer on 9/13/2021.(Original filed at Pima County Superior Court on 9/16/2021). (DLC) This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry.

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ascension Arizona v. Sedgwick Claims Management Services Incorporated et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ascension Arizona doing business as Carondelet St. Joseph's Hospital
Represented By: Mikaela G Cox
Represented By: Whitney M Harvey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sedgwick Claims Management Services Incorporated doing business as Sedgwick Managed Care
Represented By: Nathanael J Scheer
Represented By: Stewart Franklin Gross
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unknown Parties
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: New Hampshire Insurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?