MacMillan v. PWP Tucson LLC
| Donald MacMillan |
| PWP Tucson LLC |
| 4:2021cv00474 |
| November 22, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Lynnette C Kimmins |
| Rosemary Marquez |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice (Doc. #10 ) is granted. The above-captioned case is dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. Signed by Judge Rosemary Marquez on 12/28/21. (MYE)
|
| Filing 10 MOTION to Dismiss Case without Prejudice by Donald MacMillan. (Lowery, Courtney) |
| Filing 9 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Donald MacMillan : Proof of Service re: Summons and Complaint upon PWP Tucson, LLC c/o Mamie Cary on 12/4/2021. (Lowery, Courtney) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Lynnette C Kimmins for all pretrial proceedings and Report and Recommendation, in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1) and LRCiv. 72.1 and 72.2. All future filings in this case shall be designated: CV-21-00474-TUC-RM (LCK). Signed by Judge Rosemary Marquez on 12/8/21. (MYE)
|
| Filing 7 MINUTE ORDER: Pursuant to Local Rule 3.7(b), a request has been received for a random reassignment of this case to a District Judge. IT IS ORDERED this case is reassigned by random draw to District Judge Rosemary Marquez. All further pleadings/papers should now list the following COMPLETE case number: CV-21-474-TUC-RM. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (DLC) |
| Filing 6 Party Elects Assignment of Case to District Judge Jurisdiction. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (DLC) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to PWP Tucson LLC. (DLC). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
| Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-20089367. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Lynnette C Kimmins. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-21-474-TUC-LCK. Magistrate Election form attached. (DLC) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Donald MacMillan. (Lowery, Courtney) (DLC) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 402.00, receipt number 0970-20089367 filed by Donald MacMillan. (Lowery, Courtney) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit)(DLC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: MacMillan v. PWP Tucson LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Donald MacMillan | |
| Represented By: | Courtney Lowery |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: PWP Tucson LLC | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
