Cammilletti v. Monsanto Company
| Adolph Rocco Cammilletti |
| Monsanto Company |
| 4:2021cv00494 |
| December 2, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Jennifer G Zipps |
| Prisoner: Mandamus & Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO COUNSEL - The Clerk of the Panel has determined the listed action(s) is not appropriate for inclusion in this MDL-2741. See Rule 7.1(b)(i). -- AZ/4:21-cv-00494, AZ/4:21-cv-00490, AZ/4:21-cv-00462 Signed by Clerk of the Panel John W. Nichols on 1/11/2022. Associated Cases: MDL No. 2741, AZ/4:21-cv-00462, AZ/4:21-cv-00490, AZ/4:21-cv-00494 (CMD) (MAP) |
| Filing 5 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Adolph Rocco Cammilletti. (2 pages) (MYE) |
| Filing 4 First AMENDED COMPLAINT (titled: Original Complaint) against Monsanto Company filed by Adolph Rocco Cammilletti. (7 pages)(MYE) |
Filing 3
ORDER: Within 30 days of the date this Order is filed, Plaintiff must either pay the $350.00 filing fee and $52.00 administrative fee or file a complete Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and a certified six-month trust account statement. If Plaintiff fails to either pay or file a complete Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis within 30 days, the Clerk of Court must enter a judgment of dismissal of this action without prejudice and without further notice to Plaintiff and deny any pending unrelated motions as moot. Plaintiff's "File For Round Up Litigation case 19-162741" (Doc. #1 ) is dismissed for failure to file on a court-approved form. Plaintiff has 30 days from the date this Order is filed to file an amended complaint. If Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint within 30 days, the Clerk of Court must, without further notice, enter a judgment of dismissal of this action without prejudice and deny any pending unrelated motions as moot. The Clerk of Court must mail Plaintiff a court-approved form for filing an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Non-Habeas) and a civil rights complaint by a prisoner. Signed by Judge Jennifer G Zipps on 12/15/21. (See attached Order for complete details)(JAM)
|
| Filing 2 This case has been assigned to the Honorable Jennifer G Zipps. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-21-494-TUC-JGZ. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (JAM) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Adolph Rocco Cammilletti. (2 pages) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(JAM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Cammilletti v. Monsanto Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Adolph Rocco Cammilletti | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Monsanto Company | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
