Homesite Insurance Company v. Jiang
| Homesite Insurance Company |
| Zhen Jiang |
| 4:2021cv00554 |
| December 29, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Jennifer G Zipps |
| Contract: Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 NOTICE re: Service of Court's Notice to Parties by Homesite Insurance Company . (Bunch, Parker) |
Filing 7
NOTICE TO THE PARTIES that motions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) are discouraged if the defect can be cured by filing an amended pleading. The parties must meet and confer prior to the filing of such motions to determine whether it can be avoided. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff(s) serve a copy of this Order upon Defendant(s) and file a notice of service. See attached Order for complete details. Signed by Judge Jennifer G Zipps on 1/21/22. (MYE)
|
| Filing 6 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Homesite Insurance Company. (Bunch, Parker) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Zhen Jiang. (SCA). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO PARTY OF DEFICIENCY RE: CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT: Pursuant to FRCiv 7.1 and LRCiv 7.1.1 the attached Corporate Disclosure Statement form must be filed by all nongovernmental corporate parties with their first appearance. A supplemental statement must be filed upon any change in the information. In addition, if not already filed, the Corporate Disclosure Statement should be filed within 14 days. Corporate Disclosure Statement Deadline set as to Homesite Insurance Company. (SCA) |
| Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-20198440. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Jennifer G Zipps. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-21-00554-TUC-JGZ. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (SCA) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Homesite Insurance Company.(Plitt, Jordan) (SCA) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 402.00, receipt number 0970-20198440 filed by Homesite Insurance Company. (Plitt, Jordan) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Exhibit 4, #6 Exhibit 5, #7 Exhibit 6, #8 Exhibit 7, #9 Exhibit 8, #10 Exhibit 9, #11 Exhibit 10, #12 Exhibit 11, #13 Exhibit 12, #14 Exhibit 13, #15 Exhibit 14, #16 Exhibit 15, #17 Exhibit 16, #18 Exhibit 17)(SCA) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Homesite Insurance Company v. Jiang | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Homesite Insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | Jordan Ross Plitt |
| Represented By: | Parker Conlan Bunch |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Zhen Jiang | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
