Karam v. Specialized Loan Servicing LLC
| Rose A Karam |
| Specialized Loan Servicing LLC |
| 4:2022cv00029 |
| January 21, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Raner C Collins |
| Jacqueline M Rateau |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 23 REPLY to Response to Motion re: #9 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Specialized Loan Servicing LLC. (Krotzer, Solomon) |
| Filing 22 RESPONSE to Defendant's #9 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Plaintiff Rose A Karam. (MCO) |
| Filing 21 *REPLY to RESPONSE to Motion to Dismiss (Doc. #9 ) by Defendant Specialized Loan Servicing LLC. (Krotzer, Solomon) *Modified to reflect event was corrected from Response to Objection to Reply to Motion; corrected linkage on 2/18/2022 (MCO). |
Filing 20
ORDER granting #18 Motion to Allow Electronic Filing in this case only. The party is required to complete the Electronic Case File Registration form to register as a user with the Clerk's Office and to register as a subscriber to PACER (Public Access to Electronic Records) within five (5) days of the date of this Order. It is further ordered pursuant to the ECF Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual that all documents submitted for filing by Plaintiff must be electronically filed using ECF. Signed by Senior Judge Raner C Collins on 2/11/2022. (See Order for complete details) (ARC)
|
|
Filing 19
ORDER: On February 9, 2022, the Clerk of Court filed Plaintiff Rose A. Karam's Objection to Jurisdiction. (Doc. #17 ) The Court notifies Plaintiff that the Federal and Local Rules of Civil Procedure govern the proper form of legal filings and motions. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 7; LRCiv 7.1, 7.2. If Plaintiff desires any action by the Court, she must file a motion stating "with particularity the grounds" for the request and articulating "the relief sought." Fed. R. Civ. P. 7. The Court will only rule on filings that are properly labeled as motions, which state what Plaintiff would like the Court to do and why she is entitled to such relief. Should Plaintiff wish to request any action from the Court-such as a motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction-she may file a proper motion. Signed by Senior Judge Raner C Collins on 2/11/2022. (ARC)
|
|
Filing 15
ORDER: Plaintiff must file a response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. #9 ), together with copies of grievances, sworn declarations or other admissible evidence, no later than 14 days from the date of this Order. Defendants may file a reply on or before 7 days after service of Plaintiff's response. The Motion to Dismiss will be deemed ready for decision without oral argument on the day following the date set for filing a reply unless otherwise ordered by the Court. Signed by Senior Judge Raner C Collins on 2/10/22. (See attached Order for complete details)(JAM)
|
| Filing 14 MINUTE ORDER: Pursuant to Local Rule 3.7(b), a request has been received for a random reassignment of this case to a District Judge. IT IS ORDERED this case is reassigned by random draw to Senior District Judge Raner C Collins. All further pleadings/papers should now list the following COMPLETE case number: CV-22-29-TUC-RCC. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (DLC) |
| Filing 18 MOTION to Allow Electronic Filing by a Party Appearing Without an Attorney by Rose A Karam. (MCO) |
| Filing 17 OBJECTION TO JURISDICTION by Plaintiff Rose A Karam. (MCO) |
| Filing 16 Objection to Defendant's #9 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Rose A Karam. (MCO) |
| Filing 13 Party Elects Assignment of Case to District Judge Jurisdiction. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (DLC) |
| Filing 11 Magistrate Election Form resent and deadline reset (x2). (DLC) |
| Filing 10 Magistrate Election Form resent via mail and deadline reset (x2). (DLC) |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Specialized Loan Servicing LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-E)(Krotzer, Solomon) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE re: Service by Specialized Loan Servicing LLC re: #3 New Case Opened, #7 Additional Attachments to Main Document, #4 Notice to Self-Represented Litigant . (Krotzer, Solomon) |
| Filing 7 Additional Attachments to Main Document re: #1 Notice of Removal by Defendant Specialized Loan Servicing LLC. (Krotzer, Solomon) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #1 Notice of Removal filed by Specialized Loan Servicing LLC. Document not in compliance with LRCiv 7.1(a)(3) - Party names must be capitalized using proper upper and lower case type. No further action is required. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (JAM) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #1 Notice of Removal filed by Specialized Loan Servicing LLC. Pursuant to the Electronic Case Filing Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual Section II(B), attorneys are required to submit the automated Civil Cover Sheet when filing a new case. FOLLOW-UP ACTION REQUIRED: Please refile corrected document. Deficiency must be corrected within one business day of this notice. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (JAM) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANT re informational documents attached: (1) Notice to Self-Represented Litigant, (2) Federal Court Self-Service Clinic Flyer, (3) Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2, and (4) Notice and Request re Electronic Noticing. (JAM) |
| Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-20268736. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Jacqueline M Rateau. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-22-29-TUC-JR. Magistrate Election form attached. PLEASE NOTE: Plaintiff(s) and defendants that have already appeared in this case are required to file the attached Magistrate Election form within FOURTEEN (14) days of this filing. Please read attached instructions. (JAM) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Specialized Loan Servicing LLC. (Krotzer, Solomon) (JAM) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Pima County Superior Court, case number C20215788. Filing fee received: $ 402.00, receipt number 0970-20268736 filed by Specialized Loan Servicing LLC. (Krotzer, Solomon) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit)(JAM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Karam v. Specialized Loan Servicing LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Rose A Karam | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Specialized Loan Servicing LLC | |
| Represented By: | Robert Wayne Norman, Jr. |
| Represented By: | Solomon Scott Krotzer |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
