Fernandez et al v. Patton et al
| Alvaro E Fernandez and Maricela Reyes |
| Jack Lee Patton, Unknown Patton, PLD Transport Incorporated and Unknown Parties |
| 4:2022cv00032 |
| January 24, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Jennifer G Zipps |
| Personal Injury: Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 DEFENDANT'S DEMAND for Jury Trial by PLD Transport Incorporated, Jack Lee Patton. (Baltierra, Matthew) |
| Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint by PLD Transport Incorporated, Jack Lee Patton.(Baltierra, Matthew) |
| Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-20272149. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Jennifer G Zipps. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-22-32-TUC-JGZ. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (ARC) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by PLD Transport Incorporated. (Baltierra, Matthew) (ARC) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Pima County Superior Court, case number C20215717. Filing fee received: $ 402.00, receipt number 0970-20272149 filed by Jack Lee Patton, PLD Transport Incorporated. (Baltierra, Matthew) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit)(ARC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
