O'Connell v. Waterfall, Economidis, Caldwell, Hanshaw & Villamana P.C. et al
Plaintiff: Daniel H O'Connell
Defendant: Waterfall, Economidis, Caldwell, Hanshaw & Villamana P.C., Jill D Wiley, Unknown Wiley and Unknown Parties
Case Number: 4:2022cv00050
Filed: January 31, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: Jennifer G Zipps
Nature of Suit: Labor: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 18, 2022 Filing 8 ACKNOWLEDGMENT of Receipt of Remand Letter from Pima County Superior Court Clerk's Office. (REK)
February 11, 2022 Filing 7 CLERK'S JUDGMENT - IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that pursuant to the Court's Order filed February 11, 2022, this case is remanded to the Pima County Superior Court. (ARC)
February 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER granting #4 Joint Motion to Remand to State Court. This case is remanded to the Pima County Superior Court. The Clerk of the Court shall transmit a copy of this Order to the Pima County Superior Court. Immediately upon remand to Pima County Superior Court, Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint in a form that has been agreed upon by the parties and as was attached to the Parties' Motion as Exhibit A. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment and close the file in this case. It is further ordered that, in light of the Parties' Joint Motion and agreement that Plaintiff will amend his complaint, the Waterfall Defendants will not respond to Plaintiff's original Complaint, and instead will file their response(s) to the amended complaint within 14 days following service thereof to defendants' attorney by email only. Signed by Judge Jennifer G Zipps on 2/10/2022. (See Order for complete details) (Attachments: #1 Remand Letter) (ARC)
February 2, 2022 Filing 5 Additional Attachments to Main Document re: #4 Joint MOTION to Remand to State Court - Revised Proposed Order by Plaintiff Daniel H O'Connell. (Laird, Brian)
February 1, 2022 Filing 4 Joint MOTION to Remand to State Court by Waterfall, Economidis, Caldwell, Hanshaw & Villamana P.C., Jill D Wiley, Unknown Wiley. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Amended Complaint, #2 Proposed Order)(Goncharsky, Abbe)
January 31, 2022 Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-20286657. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Jennifer G Zipps. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-22-00050-TUC-JGZ. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (SCA)
January 31, 2022 Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Waterfall, Economidis, Caldwell, Hanshaw & Villamana P.C. (Goncharsky, Abbe) (SCA)
January 31, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Pima County Superior Court, case number C2022-0043. Filing fee received: $ 402.00, receipt number 0970-20286657 filed by Waterfall, Economidis, Caldwell, Hanshaw & Villamana P.C., Jill D Wiley. (Goncharsky, Abbe) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit 1, #4 Exhibit 2, #5 Exhibit 3, #6 Exhibit 4, #7 Exhibit 5)(SCA)
January 31, 2022 ***STATE COURT RECORDS RECEIVED*** SERVICE EXECUTED: Acceptance of Service re: Complaint, Summonses, and FASTAR Certificate upon Abbe M Goncharshy, Counsel for Waterfall, Economidis, Caldwell, Hanshaw & Villamana, P.C. on 01/12/2022. (Original Filed in Pima County Superior Court on 01/12/2022) SERVICE EXECUTED: Acceptance of Service re: Complaint, Summonses, and FASTAR Certificate upon Abbe M Goncharshy, Counsel for Jill D Wiley on 01/12/2022. (Original Filed in Pima County Superior Court on 01/12/2022)(SCA) This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry.

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: O'Connell v. Waterfall, Economidis, Caldwell, Hanshaw & Villamana P.C. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Daniel H O'Connell
Represented By: Brian Andrew Laird
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Waterfall, Economidis, Caldwell, Hanshaw & Villamana P.C.
Represented By: Abbe Morrison Goncharsky
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jill D Wiley
Represented By: Abbe Morrison Goncharsky
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unknown Wiley
Represented By: Abbe Morrison Goncharsky
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unknown Parties
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?