Shayan v. Pima County Adult Detention Center
| Mustafa Shayan |
| Pima County Adult Detention Center, Chris Nanos and Arizona, State of |
| 4:2022cv00115 |
| March 9, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Pro Se (Tucson) |
| Rosemary Marquez |
| Prisoner: Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT (titled as First Amended Complaint) against Arizona, State of, Chris Nanos filed by Mustafa Shayan. (15 pages) (Attachments: #1 Plaintiff's Statement)(MYE) |
| Filing 12 First AMENDED COMPLAINT against Chris Nanos, Arizona, State of filed by Mustafa Shayan. (6 pages)(MYE) |
| Filing 11 SERVICE EXECUTED : Certified Mail Receipt re: Doc. 9 upon Chris Nanos, Pima County Sheriff on 4/20/22. (MYE) |
Filing 9
ORDER FOR PAYMENT OF INMATE FILING FEE Directing Monthly Payments be made from Prison Account of Mustafa Shayan. Signed by Judge Rosemary Marquez on 4/14/22. (See attached Order for complete details.)(MYE)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDERED Plaintiff's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. #6 ) is granted. As required by the accompanying Order to the appropriate government agency, Plaintiff must pay the $350.00 filing fee and is assessed an initial partial filing fee of $34.06. The Complaint (Doc. 1) is dismissed for failure to state a claim because Plaintiff has not named a proper Defendant. Plaintiff has thirty (30) days from the date this Order is filed to file a First Amended Complaint in compliance with this Order. If Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint within 30 days, the Clerk of Court must, without further notice, enter a judgment of dismissal of this action with prejudice that states that the dismissal may count as a "strike" under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g) and deny any pending unrelated motions as moot. The Clerk of Court must mail Plaintiff a court-approved form for filing a civil rights complaint by a prisoner. Signed by Judge Rosemary Marquez on 4/13/22. (MYE)
|
| Filing 7 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Mustafa Shayan. (1 page) (MYE) |
| Filing 6 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Mustafa Shayan. (2 pages) (MYE) |
|
Filing 5
ORDERED Plaintiff's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. #2 ) is denied without prejudice. Within 30 days of the date this Order is filed, Plaintiff must either pay the $350.00 filing fee and $52.00 administrative fee or file a complete Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and a certified six-month trust account statement. If Plaintiff fails to either pay the $350.00 filing fee and $52.00 administrative fee or file a complete Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis within 30 days, the Clerk of Court must enter a judgment of dismissal of this action without prejudice and without further notice to Plaintiff and deny any pending unrelated motions as moot. The Clerk of Court must mail Plaintiff a court-approved form for filing an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Non-Habeas). Signed by Judge Rosemary Marquez on 3/11/22. (MYE)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (BAC) |
| Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Mustafa Shayan. (1 page) (BAC) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Mustafa Shayan. (8 pages) (Attachments: #1 IFP)(BAC) |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed by Mustafa Shayan. (6 pages) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(BAC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
