Parsons et al v. Aramark Sport and Entertainment Services LLC
Karen Parsons and Clay Parsons |
Aramark Sport and Entertainment Services LLC doing business as Lake Powell Resorts and Marinas |
4:2022cv00124 |
March 15, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Bruce G Macdonald |
Personal Injury: Marine |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1333 Admiralty |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 Minute Order: In accordance with 28 USC 636(c), all parties have voluntarily consented to have Magistrate Judge Bruce G. Macdonald conduct all further proceedings in this case, including trial and entry of final judgment, and conduct all post-judgment proceedings, with direct review by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, if an appeal is filed. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (DLC) |
Filing 14 Agreement to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Party agrees to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (DLC) |
Filing 12 Magistrate Election Form sent and deadline set (x1). (DLC) |
Filing 11 ORDER SETTING RULE 16 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE: Pursuant to Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a TELEPHONIC Case Management Conference is set for June 7, 2022, at 11:40 a.m., before the Honorable Bruce G. Macdonald, Courtroom 3C, Evo A. DeConcini U.S. Courthouse, 405 West Congress Street, Tucson, Arizona. The Parties are directed to call (866) 390-1828, Access Code 6244861 at the time of the hearing. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Counsel shall file with the court, on or before June 1, 2022, a Joint Report reflecting the results of their meeting and outlining the discovery plan. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bruce G Macdonald on 4/20/22. (See attached Order for complete details.)(MYE) |
Filing 10 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Aramark Sport and Entertainment Services LLC. (Curl, David) |
Filing 9 Defendant's ANSWER to Complaint of Plaintiffs Parsons by Aramark Sport and Entertainment Services LLC.(Curl, David) |
Filing 8 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Clay Parsons, Karen Parsons: Proof of Service re: Complaint and Summons upon Maria Martinez on 3/18/2022. (Clark, Douglas) |
Filing 7 Agreement to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Party agrees to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAC) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #1 Complaint filed by Karen Parsons, Clay Parsons. Document not in compliance with LRCiv 7.1(a)(3) - Party names must be capitalized using proper upper and lower case type. No further action is required. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (ARC) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Aramark Sport and Entertainment Services LLC. (ARC). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number BAZDC-20446944. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Bruce G Macdonald. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-22-124-TUC-BGM. Magistrate Election form attached. (ARC) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Clay Parsons, Karen Parsons. (Clark, Douglas) (ARC) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 402.00, receipt number BAZDC-20446944 filed by Karen Parsons, Clay Parsons. (Clark, Douglas) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ARC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.