Jessup v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Randi Jessup |
Commissioner of Social Security Administration |
4:2022cv00258 |
June 2, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Maria S Aguilera |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 Minute Order: In accordance with 28 USC 636(c), all parties have voluntarily consented to have Magistrate Judge Maria S Aguilera conduct all further proceedings in this case, including trial and entry of final judgment, and conduct all post-judgment proceedings, with direct review by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, if an appeal is filed. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (DLC) |
Filing 12 Agreement to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Party agrees to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (DLC) |
Filing 10 NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: David Priddy appearing for Commissioner of Social Security Administration. . (Priddy, David) |
NOTICE of request for e-notices by Michael A. Ambri. (Ambri, Michael) |
Filing 9 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security Administration. (MCO). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
Filing 8 SOCIAL SECURITY SCHEDULING ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that the parties must fully comply with the deadlines and procedures in this Order. (See attached Order for complete details) Signed by Magistrate Judge Maria S Aguilera on 6/7/2022. (MCO) |
Filing 7 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Maria S Aguilera on 6/7/2022. (MCO) |
Filing 6 Agreement to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Party agrees to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (DLC) |
Filing 4 This case has been assigned to the Honorable Maria S Aguilera. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-22-00258-TUC-MSA. Magistrate Election form attached. (BAC) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS Submitted by Randi Jessup. (Miller, Audrey) (BAC) |
Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Randi Jessup. (Miller, Audrey) (BAC) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Randi Jessup. (Miller, Audrey) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(BAC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Jessup v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Randi Jessup | |
Represented By: | Audrey Corinne Miller |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration | |
Represented By: | David Priddy |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.