Jefferson v. Brnovich et al
| Ricardo James Jefferson, Jr. |
| Mark Brnovich, Lori Thomas, Brian M McIntyre, Mark Daniels, Sr, Nicholas Thibault, Ian Williamson, Heather Nicola, Manish Mansukhlal Shah and Michael Powell |
| 4:2022cv00267 |
| June 6, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Pro Se (Tucson) |
| Rosemary Marquez |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Mark Brnovich, Mark Daniels, Sr, Brian M McIntyre, Heather Nicola, Michael Powell, Manish Mansukhlal Shah, Nicholas Thibault, Lori Thomas, Ian Williamson filed by Ricardo James Jefferson, Jr. (18 pages)(JAM) |
Filing 8
ORDER FOR PAYMENT OF INMATE FILING FEE Directing Monthly Payments be made from Prison Account of Ricardo James Jefferson, Jr. Signed by Judge Rosemary Marquez on 06/29/2022. (See attached Order for complete information.)(SCA)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER IT IS ORDERED: Plaintiff's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. #5 ) is granted. As required by the accompanying Order to the appropriate government agency, Plaintiff must pay the $350.00 filing fee and is assessed an initial partial filing fee of $43.46. The Complaint (Doc. #1 ) is dismissed for failure to comply with Rules 8 and 10 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff has 30 days from the date this Order is filed to file a first amended complaint in compliance with this Order. If Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint within 30 days, the Clerk of Court must, without further notice, enter a judgment of dismissal of this action without prejudice and deny any pending unrelated motions as moot. The Clerk of Court must mail Plaintiff a court-approved form for filing a civil rights complaint by a prisoner. Signed by Judge Rosemary Marquez on 06/29/2022. (See attached Order for complete information.)(SCA)
|
| Filing 6 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Ricardo James Jefferson, Jr. (1 page) (SCA) |
| Filing 5 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Ricardo James Jefferson, Jr. (2 pages) (SCA) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER: IT IS ORDERED Plaintiff's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. #2 ) is denied without prejudice. Within 30 days of the date this Order is filed, Plaintiff must either pay the $350.00 filing fee and $52.00 administrative fee or file a complete Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and a certified six-month trust account statement. If Plaintiff fails to either pay the $350.00 filing fee and $52.00 administrative fee or file a complete Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis within 30 days, the Clerk of Court must enter a judgment of dismissal of this action without prejudice and without further notice to Plaintiff and deny any pending unrelated motions as moot. The Clerk of Court must mail Plaintiff a court-approved form for filing an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Non-Habeas). Signed by Judge Rosemary Marquez on 06/09/2022. (See attached Order for complete information.)(SCA)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (SCA) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Ricardo James Jefferson, Jr. (2 pages) (SCA) |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed by Ricardo James Jefferson, Jr. (15 pages) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(SCA) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
