Graziotti v. Gutierrez et al
| Matthew C Graziotti |
| Unknown Gutierrez, C Howard, Unknown Colbert, S Smith, Unknown Dooley, Unknown Rhynard, A Estrada, Unknown Jayne, K Werner, E Lara, Unknown Duarte, Unknown Stangl, Unknown Madalozzo, Unknown Parties and Unknown Vigil |
| 4:2022cv00322 |
| July 25, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| D Thomas Ferraro (PS) |
| Rosemary Marquez |
| Prisoner: Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Filing fee: $5.00, receipt number 400000202. PAID IN FULL. (BAC) |
Filing 3
ORDER: IT IS ORDERED Within 30 days of the date this Order is filed, Petitioner must either pay $5 filing fee or file a complete Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Failure to comply will result in a judgment of dismissal of this action without prejudice, without further notice to Petitioner and denial of any pending unrelated motions as moot. Clerk must mail Petitioner a court-approved form for filing an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Habeas). Signed by Judge Rosemary Marquez on 7/27/22. (BAC)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (BAC) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Fed/2241) filed by Matthew C Graziotti. (29 pages) (Attachments: #1 Envelope, #2 Attachment)(BAC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
