Braaksma v. Tucson Police Department
Plaintiff: Roxanna Lee Braaksma
Defendant: Tucson Police and Tucson Police Department
Case Number: 4:2022cv00324
Filed: July 25, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: Scott H Rash
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDERED Plaintiff's IFP Application (Doc. #6 ) is DENIED. Plaintiff must either pay the $402.00 filing fees or file a complete Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis on or before Wednesday, October 12, 2022. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED if Plaintiff fails to either pay the $402.00 filing fees or file a complete Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis on or before Wednesday, October 12, 2022, the Clerk of Court must enter a judgment of dismissal of this action without prejudice and without further notice to Plaintiff and deny any pending unrelated motions as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED Plaintiff's Motion for Electronic Noticing (Doc. #5 ) is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Scott H Rash on 9/12/22. (MYE)
August 16, 2022 Filing 6 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Roxanna Lee Braaksma. (MYE)
August 8, 2022 Filing 5 REQUEST BY NON-PRISONER PRO SE PARTY FOR ELECTRONIC NOTICING filed by Roxanna Lee Braaksma. Pro se parties must promptly notify the Clerks Office, in writing, if there is a change in designated e-mail address or mailing address. (MYE)
August 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER: Within 30 days of the date this Order is filed, Plaintiff must either pay the $402.00 filing fees or file a complete Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. If Plaintiff fails to either pay the $402.00 filing fees or file a complete Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis within 30 days, the Clerk of Court must enter a judgment of dismissal of this action without prejudice and without further notice to Plaintiff and deny any pending unrelated motions as moot. Signed by Judge Scott H Rash on 8/4/22. (MYE)
July 26, 2022 Filing 3 NOTICE TO SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANT re informational documents attached: (1) Notice to Self-Represented Litigant, (2) Federal Court Self-Service Clinic Flyer, (3) Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2, and (4) Notice and Request re Electronic Noticing. (JAM)
July 25, 2022 Filing 2 This case has been assigned to the Honorable Scott H Rash. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-22-324-TUC-SHR. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (JAM)
July 25, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Roxanna Lee Braaksma. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(JAM)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Braaksma v. Tucson Police Department
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Roxanna Lee Braaksma
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tucson Police
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tucson Police Department
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?