Canaletti v. ARS National Services Incorporated
| Joseph Canaletti |
| ARS National Services Incorporated |
| 4:2022cv00427 |
| September 16, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| John C Hinderaker |
| Other Statutes: Other Statutory Actions |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Settlement by Joseph Canaletti. (McBride, Ryan) |
Filing 9
ORDER granting #7 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer to #1 Complaint. Defendant ARS National Services, Inc. shall file an Answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint on or before November 14, 2022. Signed by Judge John C Hinderaker on 10/14/22. (JAM)
|
| Filing 8 Corporate Disclosure Statement by ARS National Services Incorporated. (Martinez, Barbara) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re: #1 Complaint by ARS National Services Incorporated. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Martinez, Barbara) |
| Filing 6 Additional Attachments to Main Document re: #1 Complaint, 5 Notice of Deficiency (Text Only),, Automated Civil Cover Sheet by Plaintiff Joseph Canaletti. (McBride, Ryan) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: [1-1] Civil Cover Sheet filed by Joseph Canaletti. Pursuant to the Electronic Case Filing Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual Section II(B), attorneys are required to submit the automated Civil Cover Sheet when filing a new case. FOLLOW-UP ACTION REQUIRED: Please refile corrected document. Deficiency must be corrected within one business day of this notice. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MYE) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to ARS National Services Incorporated. (MYE). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
| Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number AAZDC-21109204. This case has been assigned to the Honorable John C Hinderaker. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-22-427-TUC-JCH. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (MYE) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Joseph Canaletti. (McBride, Ryan) (MYE) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 402.00, receipt number AAZDC-21109204 filed by Joseph Canaletti. (McBride, Ryan) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(MYE) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Canaletti v. ARS National Services Incorporated | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Joseph Canaletti | |
| Represented By: | David James McGlothlin |
| Represented By: | Ryan Lee McBride |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: ARS National Services Incorporated | |
| Represented By: | Barbara Ann Martinez |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
